首页> 外文会议>2011 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society >What is wrong with teaching to the test: Uncertainty techniques help in understanding (and hopefully resolving) the controversy
【24h】

What is wrong with teaching to the test: Uncertainty techniques help in understanding (and hopefully resolving) the controversy

机译:进行测试教学有什么问题:不确定性技术有助于理解(并有望解决)争议

获取原文

摘要

In the USA, in the last decade, standards have been adapted for each grade level. These standards are annually checked by state-wide tests. The results of these tests often determine the school's funding and even the school's future existence. Due to this importance, a large amount of time is spent on teaching to the tests. Most teachers believe that this testing approach is detrimental to student education. This belief seems to be empirically supported by the fact that so far, the testing approach has not led to spectacular improvements promised by its proponents. While this empirical evidence is reasonably convincing, the teacher community has not yet fully succeeded in clearly explaining their position to the general public — because the opposing argument (of the need for accountability) also seems to be reasonably convincing. In this paper, we show that the situation becomes much clearer if we take uncertainty into account — and that, hopefully, a proper use of uncertainty can help in resolving this situation.
机译:在过去的十年中,在美国,已经针对每个年级对标准进行了调整。这些标准每年由全州范围的测试进行检查。这些测试的结果通常决定学校的资金,甚至决定学校的未来。由于这种重要性,在教学测试上花费了大量时间。大多数老师认为,这种测试方法不利于学生的教育。到目前为止,测试方法尚未带来支持者承诺的惊人改进,这一事实似乎在经验上得到了支持。尽管这种经验证据令人信服,但教师群体尚未完全成功地向公众清楚地解释其立场,因为(要求问责制)相反的论点似乎也令人信服。在本文中,我们表明,如果考虑到不确定性,情况将变得更加清晰-希望适当地使用不确定性可以帮助解决这种情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号