首页> 外文会议>International low impact development conference >Control Effects Comparison of Three Kinds of Typical LID Infiltration and Emission Reduction Measures: Beijing Case Study
【24h】

Control Effects Comparison of Three Kinds of Typical LID Infiltration and Emission Reduction Measures: Beijing Case Study

机译:三种典型盖渗透和减排措施的控制效果:北京案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Low impact development (LID) stormwater management system emphasizes source control using structural and non-structural measures to achieve the objective of runoff emission reduction. Three typical LID technical measures, permeable pavement, sunken greenbelt and rain garden are evaluated on design methods, application conditions and key parameters of them. All of them are very effective for runoff volume reducing, peak rate and pollution control. Combining with the typical practices and key design parameters of three measures, hydrologic quantitative reductions evaluation including the reductions calculation in runoff volume, peak rate and the total pollutants were given, and then the cost-effectiveness assessment through the investment analysis were carried out, the control effects of them were compared through a sample project. The conclusions are valuable for urban stormwater management in Beijing and other cities in China.
机译:低冲击开发(盖子)雨水管理系统强调采用结构性和非结构措施来实现径流减排的目标。在设计方法,应用条件和关键参数上评估了三种典型的盖子技术措施,可渗透的路面,凹陷绿贝和雨水花园。所有这些都非常有效地对径流量降低,峰值率和污染控制。结合三种措施的典型实践和关键设计参数,给出了包括径流量,峰值率和总污染物的减少计算的水文定量减少评估,然后通过投资分析进行成本效益评估,通过样本项目比较它们的控制效果。结论对于北京和中国其他城市的城市雨水管理是有价值的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号