首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Evaluation of Water Level Forecast Guidance from Real Time Ocean Forecast Systems
【24h】

Evaluation of Water Level Forecast Guidance from Real Time Ocean Forecast Systems

机译:实时海洋预报系统对水位预报指导的评估

获取原文

摘要

The water level guidance, both subtidal and total, from real time oceanographic forecast modeling systems was compared to 24 National Ocean Service (NOS) water level stations on the U.S. East Coast and Gulf of Mexico Coast. The National Weather Service (NWS) Real Time Ocean Forecast System (RTOFS), the NWS Extra-Tropical Storm Surge (ETSS) Model, the United States Navy Global-Navy Coupled Ocean Model (G-NCOM), and the University of North Carolina Western North Atlantic Forecast System Advanced Circulation (ADCIRC) Model water level forecasts were compared with the observations during November 2008. Because the ETSS model is subtidal, the ETSS forecast water levels were compared with observed subtidal water levels, which were obtained using a 30 hour low pass Fourier filter. Because the RTOFS, ADCIRC, and G-NCOM include tides, their forecast water levels were compared with the total observed water level. Two new versions of RTOFS were considered and contrasted with the previous RTOFS results documented in Richardson and Schmalz (2007). Using the hourly nowcast water levels, it was possible to perform a harmonic analysis as well as a subtidal comparison using a 30 hour low pass Fourier filter with subtidal observed water levels for both RTOFS and ADCIRC. Since G-NCOM water levels were at 3-hour intervals, subtidal results could not be obtained via Fourier filter and were obtained by subtraction of the NOS predicted astronomic tide from the total nowcast water level (detiding).The evaluation demonstrates that for total water level forecast guidance, the order of skill in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) is first ADCIRC, next G-NCOM, followed by RTOFS. For subtidal water level forecast guidance, again based on RMSE, the order of skill is ETSS, ADCIRC, RTOFS, and G-NCOM. In conclusion, plans for further streamlining of the water evaluation toolset as well as the extension of the evaluation to salinity, temperature, and currents are presented.
机译:来自实时海洋预报建模系统的潮汐和总水位指导与美国东海岸和墨西哥湾沿岸的24个国家海洋服务(NOS)水位站进行了比较。国家气象局(NWS)实时海洋预报系统(RTOFS),NWS热带外风暴潮(ETSS)模型,美国海军全球-海军耦合海洋模型(G-NCOM)和北卡罗来纳大学对北大西洋西部先进循环系统(ADCIRC)模型的水位预报与2008年11月的观测值进行了比较。由于ETSS模型是潮下的,因此将ETSS预报的水位与观测到的潮下水位进行了比较,后者使用30小时低通傅立叶滤波器。由于RTOFS,ADCIRC和G-NCOM包含潮汐,因此将它们的预测水位与总观测水位进行了比较。考虑了两个新版本的RTOFS,并将它们与Richardson和Schmalz(2007)中记录的以前的RTOFS结果进行了对比。使用每小时预报的水位,可以使用30小时的低通傅立叶滤波器进行潮汐分析和潮汐比较,并同时具有RTOFS和ADCIRC的潮汐下观测水位。由于G-NCOM的水位间隔为3小时,因此无法通过傅立叶过滤器获得潮汐结果,而是通过从总临近预报的水位中减去NOS预测的天文潮来获得潮汐结果(确定)。 该评估表明,对于总水位预测指导,按照均方根误差(RMSE)的技能顺序为:首先是ADCIRC,其次是G-NCOM,其次是RTOFS。对于潮汐水位预报指导,同样基于RMSE,其技能顺序为ETSS,ADCIRC,RTOFS和G-NCOM。最后,提出了进一步简化水评估工具集以及将评估范围扩展至盐度,温度和水流的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号