首页> 外文会议>SpaceOps conference >Analysis of Ground Operator Errors
【24h】

Analysis of Ground Operator Errors

机译:地面操作员错误分析

获取原文

摘要

ESTRACK, the European network of tracking ground stations, is remotely operated by a 24 h team located in ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, called ECC team. In order to provide the requested tracking services the ECC team has to coordinate with several entities: the Scheduling Office, the satellite mission teams, the local maintenance teams and the external tracking service suppliers. The growing interest on human factors impacting space missions triggered the collection of related measures using ESTRACK service availability as initial case study. Since 2007 the ESTRACK incidents attributed to human errors of the ECC team and the interacting entities have been isolated for a dedicated analysis and investigation. After an initial cleaning of the records, the paper describes the operational context of this collection of documented human errors and compares them against the volume of performed activities. A second classification discriminates between nominal and contingency operational scenario. The result is an uneven distribution of human error rate, mostly toward the execution of nominal procedures. The core of the analysis consists of the driver identification for each human error. The drivers are grouped in two categories: endogenous and exogenous drivers ["Human Error: Cause, Prediction, Reduction", Senders and Moray, 1991]. The endogenous drivers are connected to the individual responsibility of the ground operator with respect to his/her responsibility and acquired knowledge. The exogenous drivers are related to external factors inducing the operator in error. Out of this distribution the three most accounted drivers (not following procedures, lack of attention, inadequate MMI) are discussed with examples and recovery goal. This analysis provides the basis for corrective and preventive measures to prevent human errors in ESTRACK services, although the system and organisation evolution will present other new challenges to the operators. It will also constitute the methodological reference to analyse human errors of spacecraft operators.
机译:欧洲追踪地面站网络的Estrack通过位于德国德国达姆施塔特(Darmstadt)的24小时队,叫做ECC队的24小时队。为了提供所请求的跟踪服务,ECC团队必须与若干实体协调:调度办公室,卫星使命团队,本地维护团队和外部跟踪服务供应商。对人类因素的兴趣越来越兴趣,影响空间任务的兴趣使用Estrack服务可用性作为初始案例研究引发了相关措施的收集。自2007年以来,归因于ECC团队的人为错误和互动实体的雌攻击事件已被孤立,以便专用分析和调查。在初步清洁记录之后,本文介绍了该集合的人类错误的运营背景,并将其与执行活动的体积进行比较。第二分类判断标称和应急业务情景之间的判断。结果是人为错误率的不均匀分布,主要是朝着授权程序的执行。分析的核心包括每个人为错误的驱动程序识别。司机分为两类:内源性和外源驱动程序[“人为错误:原因,预测,减少”,发件人和Moray,1991。内源性司机与地面运营商的个人责任相对于他/她的责任和获得的知识。外源驱动程序与误诱导操作员的外部因素有关。除了这个分布中,三个最核算的司机(没有遵循程序,缺乏关注,不适当的MMI)都与例子和恢复目标讨论。此分析为防止勘测服务中的纠正性和预防措施提供了依据,尽管系统和组织进化将对运营商带来其他新挑战。它还将构成分析航天器运营商的人为错误的方法论参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号