首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference >Comparing two operating-room-allocation policies for elective and emergency surgeries
【24h】

Comparing two operating-room-allocation policies for elective and emergency surgeries

机译:比较两种针对急诊和急诊手术室的手术室分配政策

获取原文

摘要

When organizing the operating theatre and scheduling surgeries, hospitals face a trade-off between the need to be responsive to emergency cases and to conduct scheduled elective surgeries efficiently. We develop a simulation model to compare a flexible and a focused resource-allocation policy. We evaluate these two policies on patient and provider outcome measures, including patient wait time and physician overtime. We find that the focused policy results in lower elective wait time and lower overtime, which leads to the conclusion that electives benefit more from the elimination of emergency disruptions than what they lose from the reduced access to operating rooms. Emergency patient wait time, however, increases significantly as we shift from the flexible to the focused policy. The sensitivity analysis showed that average emergency wait time can decrease as the processing time variability increases. The trade-off between efficiency and responsiveness calls for additional research on other operating-room-allocation policies.
机译:在组织手术室和安排手术时,医院需要权衡对紧急情况做出反应和有效地安排定期选修手术之间的权衡。我们开发了一个仿真模型,以比较灵活的和重点突出的资源分配策略。我们评估了有关患者和提供者结果衡量的这两项政策,包括患者等待时间和医师加班时间。我们发现,集中的政策导致了更少的选修等待时间和更少的加班时间,这得出的结论是,选民从消除紧急情况中受益的多于他们因减少进入手术室所遭受的损失。但是,随着我们从灵活政策转向重点政策,急诊病人的等待时间将大大增加。敏感性分析表明,平均紧急等待时间可以随着处理时间变异性的增加而减少。效率和响应能力之间的权衡要求对其他手术室分配策略进行更多研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号