首页> 外文会议>2010 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing >Finite Element Analysis of Acetabular Transverse Fracture Reconstruction Treated with Different Internal Fixation Methods
【24h】

Finite Element Analysis of Acetabular Transverse Fracture Reconstruction Treated with Different Internal Fixation Methods

机译:不同内固定方法治疗髋臼横向骨折的有限元分析

获取原文

摘要

This article established the pelvis models with aeolotropic material property, and made modeling and mechanical analysis of the acetabular transverse fracture models treated with different internal fixation methods. The mechanical indexes we interested in are as follows, the maximal displacement, the maximum equivalent stress and the maximum stress around the fracture line. Through the compare of these indexes, we found the biomechanical properties differences of the two groups of fixation methods. The first group is including the posterior column long plate (NPL) and the posterior column short plate (NPS) fixations. The second group is composed of the following three double-column fixation methods, the double-column lag screws (SSG), the anterior column lag screw and posterior plate (SPG) fixation and the double-column plates (PPG) methods. All these analyses are during the double-leg stand position. The conclusions are as follows: NPL is much better than NPS. SSG is better than SPG, while SPG is better than PPG.
机译:本文建立了具有各向异性材料特性的骨盆模型,并对采用不同内固定方法治疗的髋臼横向骨折模型进行了建模和力学分析。我们感兴趣的力学指标如下:断裂线附近的最大位移,最大等效应力和最大应力。通过比较这些指标,我们发现两组固定方法的生物力学性能差异。第一组包括后柱长板(NPL)和后柱短板(NPS)固定。第二组由以下三种双柱固定方法组成:双柱拉力螺钉(SSG),前柱拉力螺钉和后钢板(SPG)固定以及双柱钢板(PPG)方法。所有这些分析都是在双腿站立状态下进行的。结论如下:NPL比NPS好得多。 SSG优于SPG,而SPG优于PPG。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号