首页> 外文会议>European corrosion congress;EUROCORR 2009 >CORROSION RESISTANCE OF AUSTENITIC AND LOW-NICKEL DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL BARS
【24h】

CORROSION RESISTANCE OF AUSTENITIC AND LOW-NICKEL DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL BARS

机译:奥氏体和低镍双相不锈钢的耐蚀性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The use of stainless steel bars in reinforced concrete structures can be considered as an effective method to prevent corrosion in aggressive environments, especially in the presence of chlorides. The cost of this preventive technique often limits its use. A selective use of the stainless steel bars, i.e. limited to the more vulnerable parts of the structure, can significantly reduce costs of using stainless steel. This is possible since, as demonstrated by Pedeferri et al., the effect of the galvanic coupling between conventional carbon steel bars and stainless steel bars is negligible. A designer of reinforced concrete structures can decide, according to the required service life and to the environmental aggressiveness, where it could be convenient to use stainless steel bars. For an estimation of the service life of structures where stainless steel bars are used, the chloride threshold for stainless steel bars should be defined, and the influence of chemical composition and metallurgical factors that may affect the corrosion resistance (strengthening, welding, surface finishing, etc.) should be assessed. The number of types of stainless steels proposed on the market has increased in recent years, due to the increase and fluctuation of cost of traditional austenitic stainless steels (1.4301 and 1.4401), as a consequence of variations in the cost of alloying elements, especially nickel. Duplex stainless steels with low nickel content have been proposed as an alternative to traditional steels to reduce the cost of the bars; nevertheless, few results are available regarding their corrosion performance in chloride contaminated concrete.This paper summarises the results of a research aimed at studying the corrosion resistance of two low-nickel austeno-ferritic stainless steels compared to traditional austenitic stainless steels in chloride bearing concrete. Tests were carried out on ribbed bars of austenitic (1.4311 and 1.4406) and duplex (1.4362 and 1.4162) stainless steels. Stainless steel bars were embedded in concrete specimens contaminated by chloride (up to 8% by mass of cement) and corrosion rate and potential were measured at 20°C and 90% R.H. Potentiodynamic and potentiostatic polarisation tests were also carried out in neutral and alkaline solutions with different chloride concentrations (up to 10% by mass), to evaluate the pitting potential and the critical chloride content to corrosion initiation of the stainless steel bars.The paper discusses the difference in the corrosion resistance between traditional austenitic and low-nickel duplex stainless steel bars as a function of the chloride content, and analyses the effects of the chemical composition. An attempt to define a chloride threshold for the different stainless steels is made.
机译:在钢筋混凝土结构中使用不锈钢条可以被认为是防止在侵蚀性环境中腐蚀的有效方法,特别是在存在氯化物的情况下。这种预防技术的成本通常会限制其使用。选择性地使用不锈钢条,即仅限于结构中较脆弱的部分,可以显着降低使用不锈钢的成本。这是可能的,因为,如Pedeferri等人所证明的那样,传统碳素钢棒和不锈钢棒之间的电流偶合效应可忽略不计。钢筋混凝土结构的设计者可以根据所需的使用寿命和对环境的侵害性,决定使用不锈钢棒的方便位置。为了估算使用不锈钢棒的结构的使用寿命,应定义不锈钢棒的氯化物阈值,以及可能影响耐蚀性的化学成分和冶金因素的影响(强化,焊接,表面处理,等)。近年来,由于合金元素(尤其是镍)成本变化的结果,由于传统奥氏体不锈钢(1.4301和1.4401)的成本增加和波动,市场上提议的不锈钢类型数量有所增加。 。镍含量低的双相不锈钢已被提议作为传统钢的替代品,以降低棒材的成本。然而,关于它们在氯化物污染的混凝土中的腐蚀性能,几乎没有结果。 本文总结了旨在研究两种低镍奥氏体-铁素体不锈钢与传统奥氏体不锈钢在含氯混凝土中的耐蚀性研究的结果。在奥氏体(1.4311和1.4406)和双相(1.4362和1.4162)不锈钢的肋条上进行测试。将不锈钢条埋入受氯离子污染的混凝土样品中(水泥质量最高可达8%),并在20°C和90%RH的条件下测量腐蚀速率和电势。用不同的氯化物浓度(按质量计最高为10%)来评估点蚀电位和对不锈钢条腐蚀起关键作用的临界氯化物含量。 本文讨论了传统奥氏体和低镍双相不锈钢棒材的耐腐蚀性随氯化物含量的变化,并分析了化学成分的影响。尝试定义不同不锈钢的氯化物阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号