首页> 外文会议>The 11th IEEE International Conference on Communications Systems(第11届电子和电气工程师协会国际通信系统会议)(IEEE ICCS 2008)论文集 >Comparison of Decoding Turbo Gallager Codes in Hybrid Decoding Arrangements with Different Iterative Decoders over the Erasure Channel
【24h】

Comparison of Decoding Turbo Gallager Codes in Hybrid Decoding Arrangements with Different Iterative Decoders over the Erasure Channel

机译:擦除信道上具有不同迭代解码器的混合解码方案中解码Turbo Gallager码的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, different iterative decoders for turbo Gallager codes are optimised and compared for the binary erasure channel. The complexity and performance differences between turbo decoder, BCJR-based Look-Up Table decoder and belief propagation decoder are analysed and evaluated. A hybrid decoding arrangement, which uses an iterative decoder followed by a maximum likelihood “In-Place” matrix inversion algorithm, is compared for the different iterative decoders. Results are presented which show that the BCJR-based iterative decoders achieve better performance than using the belief propagation decoder for turbo Gallager codes in the erasure channel. When small encoder memory is selected, the optimised Look-Up Table decoder provides a good balance between convergence performance and complexity.
机译:在本文中,针对turbo Gallager码的不同迭代解码器进行了优化,并针对二进制擦除信道进行了比较。分析并评估了Turbo解码器,基于BCJR的查找表解码器和置信度传播解码器之间的复杂性和性能差异。对于不同的迭代解码器,比较了使用迭代解码器和最大似然“就地”矩阵求逆算法的混合解码方案。结果表明,基于BCJR的迭代解码器比在擦除信道中对Turbo Gallager码使用置信传播解码器具有更好的性能。当选择小编码器存储,优化的查找表解码器提供的收敛性能和复杂性之间的良好平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号