首页> 外文会议>Corrosion 2008;Corrosion conference and expo >Overall Mechanisms of High pH and Near-Neutral pH SCC, Models for Forecasting SCC Susceptible Locations, and Simple Algorithms for Predicting High pH SCC Crack Growth Rates
【24h】

Overall Mechanisms of High pH and Near-Neutral pH SCC, Models for Forecasting SCC Susceptible Locations, and Simple Algorithms for Predicting High pH SCC Crack Growth Rates

机译:高pH和近中性pH SCC的整体机理,SCC易感位置的预测模型以及高pH SCC裂纹扩展速率的简单算法

获取原文

摘要

Issues: The current practice of determining pipeline stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptible locations, for pipe segments where In-Line Inspection (ILI) tools or hydrotests are not applicable, is based on known characteristics of past SCC sites. These characteristics include the type, age, and conditions of the coating; the type of steel and weld; the surface treatment, age, manufacturer, corrosion status and past SCC experience of the pipe; the type of soil, wet/dry cycles, and ground water chemistry including pH, ionic species such as Na~+, Ca~(2+) and Cl~-, molecular species such as CO_2 and O_2, and bacteria types and number; the performance of cathodic protection (CP); the operating fluid temperature, pressure and loading conditions, etc. As the range of SCC conditions continues to expand with time due to new SCC incidents, the number of SCC characteristic variables will continue to grow. These variables and their complex and often unknown interactions should, as much as possible, be accounted for when SCC susceptible sites are determined. These sites can either be locations where the ILI data cannot provide distinctive determination of whether the defects are actually cracks due to resolution limitations, or locations where ILI tools are not applicable while complying with federal regulations, verification of no SCC threat in those sites, particularly in high consequence areas, must be performed through the use of direct assessment (DA) methodology or excavations. Due to the lack of a clear understanding of the roles of the above variables and their interactions in SCC nucleation and propagation, the current practice often relies on empirical or expert judgment of how the above numerous variables and their interactions relate to SCC. Although useful, such an approach can lead to either crude or non-reliable determination of SCC sites due to the complexity of the cracking process,Gap: An alternative approach would be to use a modeling tool, which would incorporate many, if not all, of the above variables and their interactions in a comprehensive package, either as a software code, or preferably, in some simplified mathematical formula or spreadsheet, that would allow for thejudgment of SCC susceptible sites based on a single or no more than a few comprehensive outputs (from the tool). Soil models are an example of such an attempt. Although proven to be useful in the field for near-neutral pH SCC, such a model is limited to predict bulk soil chemistry while it is the chemistry and potential local in coating-disbonded regions that are most relevant to SCC susceptibility, initiation and propagation. For that reason, laboratory and field tests use field-sampled or -simulated chemistry in coating-disbonded regions near cracks to study SCC characteristics, such as cracking potential and/or crack growth rates (CGRs). Since both soil models and the current SCC DA methodology rely on conditions in bulk soils, clearly, there is a gap between the SCC sites determined from the current practice and the real SCC sites.Approach: This gap must be filled in order to achieve a more reliable prediction of SCC locations. A project for developing a comprehensive predictive model to fill that gap is still on-going. Built on solid fundamental principles, this model would permit chemistry and potential in the coating-disbonded region to be predicted through the use of known or measurable bulk soil chemistry and potential near the holiday. By comparison to SCC characteristics known from previous lab or field studies or from field failure analyses or experience, a more reliable determination of SCC susceptible sites can be realized. Since some of the modeling framework and results were reported elsewhere and new modeling results are yet to be summarized, the concern of this work is to: (1) provide a comprehensive and new understanding of the fundamentals behind the process of both high pH SCC and near-neutral pH SCC, (2) discuss example results obtained from a recent model that is capable of predicting certain conditions in a coating-disbonded region relevant to SCC, and (3) derive simple algorithms for predicting high pH SCC growth rates.
机译:问题:目前确定管道应力腐蚀开裂(SCC)易感位置,用于在线检查(ILI)工具或HATTRESTS不适用的管段的实践是基于过去SCC位点的已知特征。这些特性包括涂层的类型,年龄和条件;钢和焊缝的类型;表面处理,年龄,制造商,腐蚀状态和管道的SCC体验;土壤,湿/干循环和地面水化学的类型,包括pH,离子物质,如Na〜+,Ca〜(2+)和Cl〜 - ,分子种,如CO_2和O_2,以及细菌类型和数量;阴极保护的性能(CP);随着SCC条件的范围随着新的SCC事件而随着时间的推移,运行流体温度,压力和装载条件等,SCC特征变量的数量将继续生长。这些变量及其复杂的和通常未知的相互作用应尽可能地考虑SCC易感位点时。这些站点可以是ILI数据不能提供独特的确定缺陷是否实际上裂缝的位置,或者由于分辨率限制,或者ILI工具不适用的位置,同时遵守联邦法规,在这些地点核断没有SCC威胁,特别是在高后果区域中,必须通过使用直接评估(DA)方法或挖掘来执行。由于缺乏对SCC成核和传播中的上述变量的角色及其相互作用的明确了解,目前的实践通常依赖于对上述多种变量及其相互作用的经验或专家判断与SCC相关。虽然有用,这种方法可以导致由于裂化过程的复杂性而导致SCC位点的原油或不可靠测定, 差距:替代方法是使用建模工具,该工具将包含许多,如果不是全部,以上变量和它们的交互,也可以是软件代码,或者最好在一些简化的数学公式或电子表格中,这将允许 基于单个或不超过一些全面输出(来自工具)的SCC易感网站的判断。土壤模型是这种尝试的一个例子。虽然被证明在近中性pH的领域中是有用的,但这种模型仅限于预测散装土壤化学,同时它是与SCC易感性,启动和传播最相关的涂层分离区域中的化学和潜在局部。因此,实验室和现场试验在裂缝附近的涂层分离区域中使用现场采样的或刺激化学,以研究SCC特性,例如裂解潜在和/或裂纹生长速率(CGR)。由于土壤模型和当前的SCC DA方法依赖于散装土壤中的条件,显然,SCC位点之间的间隙与当前的实践和真实的SCC位点确定。 方法:必须填充此间隙以实现对SCC位置的更可靠预测。开发综合预测模型的项目,以填补这种差距仍在继续。基于稳定的基本原理,该模型将允许在涂层分离区域中的化学和潜力来预测,通过在假期附近使用已知或可测量的散装土壤化学和潜力来预测。通过比较以前的实验室或现场研究中已知的SCC特性或来自现场失败分析或经验,可以实现更可靠的SCC易感位点的确定。由于一些建模框架和结果报告了其他地方,并且尚未概述新的建模结果,因此对这项工作的关注是:(1)为高pHCCC的过程背后的基础知识提供全面和新的了解近中性pHCC,(2)讨论从最近的模型获得的实施例结果,该模型能够预测与SCC相关的涂层脱粘区域中的某些条件,并且(3)衍生出用于预测高pH的SCC生长速率的简单算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号