首页> 外文会议>Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists >PERFORMANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES WITH CONTRASTING GROWTH HABIT IN DIFFERENT ROW SPACINGS AND CONFIGURATIONS
【24h】

PERFORMANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES WITH CONTRASTING GROWTH HABIT IN DIFFERENT ROW SPACINGS AND CONFIGURATIONS

机译:不同行距和构型下具有不同生长习性的甘蔗品种的表现

获取原文

摘要

Controlled traffic (matching wheel and row spacing) is being widely adopted in the Australian sugar industry to minimise the adverse effect of soil compaction caused by heavy machinery such as cane harvesters and haul-outs. In this study, the performance of current cane varieties with contrasting growth habits in differing row spacings and planting arrangements designed to achieve controlled traffic outcomes is reported. The study was conducted on an irrigated site in the Farnsfield district of the Isis mill area. Cane varieties Q138, Q188~Φ, Q205~Φ and Q222~Φ were planted with whole stick, conventional mouldboard opener planters in 1.5 m and 1.8 m single rows and in dual rows on 1.8 m or 2.0 m centres, as well as by billet planting in a 1.8 m wide throat system. Shoot counts and biomass samples were collected at intervals during the growing season. There were no significant differences in cane yields, ccs or sugar yields between row spacings at harvest, and nor was there any significant interaction between varieties and row spacings for any parameter. This was despite there being significantly fewer harvested stalks in 1.8 m single rows (8.2/m~2) and 1.8 m wide throat (9.3/m~2) than in standard 1.5 m single rows (10.2/m~2) or the 1.8 m (10.6/m~2) and 2.0 m (10.3/m~2) dual row spacings. Much heavier individual stalk weights recorded in the 1.8 m single and wide throat billet plantings were able to compensate for lower stalk numbers. Results confirm the relative insensitivity of cane yields to crop row spacing and suggest considerable flexibility in developing row spacings to suit controlled traffic farming systems. There were significant differences between varieties in cane yields, ccs and sugar yields. Cane yields for Q205~Φ and Q222~Φ (124 t/ha and 121 t/ha) were significantly higher than Q188~Φ (115 t/ha) and Q138 (112 t/ha). However, in terms of sugar yield, these cane yield differences were modified to some extent by variation in ccs, with Q222~Φ and Q188~Φ (13.8% and 13.5%, respectively) having higher CCS than Q205~Φ (12.9%) and Q138 (11.1%). The combined effects resulted in the highest sugar yields in Q222~Φ (16.8 t/ha), with Q205~Φ and Q188~Φ (15.8 and 15.5 t/ha, respectively) out yielding Q138 (12.7 t/ha). Varieties used different strategies to achieve final cane yields, with high final stalk numbers in Q138 (10.5/m~2) and low stalk numbers in Q188~Φ (9.0/m~2) compensated for by differences in individual stalk weights.
机译:受控的交通(匹配轮和行间距)在澳大利亚糖业中被广泛采用,以最大限度地减少由甘蔗收割机等重型机械和牵引机引起的土壤压实的不利影响。在这项研究中,报道了当前甘蔗品种的性能,具有不同行间距和旨在实现受控交通结果的种植布置的对比生长习惯。该研究是在ISIS磨坊地区法拉塞菲尔德区的灌溉场地进行的。用整个棒种植甘蔗品种Q138,Q188〜φ,Q205〜Φ和Q222〜φ,常规的Mladboard Opener Planters在1.5米和1.8米的单行中和1.8米或2.0米的双行中,以及钢坯种植在1.8米宽的喉咙系统中。在生长季节期间以间隔收集射击计数和生物质样品。在收获的行间距之间的甘蔗产量,CC或糖产量没有显着差异,并且对于任何参数的品种和行间距之间也没有任何显着的相互作用。尽管在1.8米的单行(8.2 / m〜2)和1.8米宽的喉咙(9.3 / m〜2)中,这是显着的收获茎(9.3 / m〜2),但比标准的1.5米单行(10.2 / m〜2)或1.8 M(10.6 / m〜2)和2.0 m(10.3 / m〜2)双排间距。在1.8米的单个和宽喉部坯料种植中记录的更重较重的单个茎重量能够弥补较低的茎数。结果证实了甘蔗产量的相对不敏感性,以裁剪行间距,提出了发展行间距的相当灵活性,以适应受控交通农业系统。甘蔗产量,CCS和糖产量之间的品种之间存在显着差异。 Q205〜φ和Q222〜φ(124t / ha和121 t / ha)的甘蔗产生显着高于Q188〜φ(115吨/公顷)和Q138(112吨/公顷)。然而,就糖产率而言,通过CCS的变化,在某种程度上在某种程度上改变了这些甘蔗产量差异,Q222〜φ和Q188〜φ(分别为13.8%和13.5%),其具有比Q205〜φ更高的CC(12.9%)和Q138(11.1%)。组合效果导致Q222〜φ(16.8吨/公顷)中的最高糖产量,Q205〜φ和Q188〜φ(分别为15.8和15.5吨/公顷),得到Q138(12.7吨/公顷)。品种使用不同的策略来实现最终甘蔗产量,在Q138(10.5 / m〜2)中的高最终茎数,Q188〜φ(9.0 / m〜2)的低茎数由个体茎重的差异得到补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号