首页> 外文会议>2007年战略管理国际会议 >The Cultural Consequences of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation——the Case of Transnational Entrepreneurs vs. Indigenous Entrepreneurs
【24h】

The Cultural Consequences of Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation——the Case of Transnational Entrepreneurs vs. Indigenous Entrepreneurs

机译:机会识别与开发的文化后果-以跨国企业家与本土企业家为例

获取原文

摘要

The influence of culture on entrepreneurship has been of continued scholarly interest for over three decades (George & Zahra, 2002), Previous research indicated that some cultures are more conducive for entrepreneurship than others (Tan, 2002; Mueller & Thomas, 2000), however, one line of research that has not dealt with these processes, contrary to the cross-cultural perspective, is that on acculturation, specifically in the context of entrepreneurs with transnational background. Scholarly community has called upon theoretical rationales drawn from acculturation which offers a promising approach to grounding future investigation on entrepreneurial studies (George & Zahra, 2002).This paper aims to study the influence of acculturation experience on transnational entrepreneurs within an emerging economy setting, through a thorough review of literature on the subject, entrepreneurs are often characterized by their ability to recognize opportunities (Bygrave & Hofer, 1991), and the most basic entrepreneurial actions involve the pursuit of opportunity (Stevenson & Jarillo, 1990). However, what if the agents "entrepreneurs" have previously been exposed to a secondary culture that is different from his/her own culture of origin (Hong, et al, 2000)? The extent to which, literature have failed to address this important aspect of cultural dimension of entrepreneurial activities, shed light upon the purpose of this paper, which is to propose a somewhat different approach to understand the opportunity recognition process rooted with acculturation theory. We propose that opportunity recognition is a special case of the creative process, which can be demonstrated through culture consequences; entrepreneurs who have experienced an acculturation process (namely: creative thinking, problem solving, logical reasoning, bilingualism, and social capital) developed a pattern of recognition featured with superior entrepreneurial alertness and bisociative thinking in recognizing and exploiting new venture opportunities, than those who did not have the acculturation experience: Indigenous Entrepreneurs.By employing a combined conceptual framework of resource-based view, social capital network, and acculturation theory, we aim to investigate whether transnational entrepreneurs have gained comparative advantages over indigenous entrepreneurs at the firm level, particularly in explaining "why" instead of "how" of this process, or indeed to attempt to contribute to the most prominent question within opportunity recognition research: Why some people recognize opportunities and some don't (Baron, 2006; Shane & Venkataraman, 2000; Gaglio & Taub, 1992; Long & McMullan, 1984).
机译:在过去的三十多年中,文化对企业家精神的影响一直引起学术界的关注(George&Zahra,2002)。先前的研究表明,某些文化比其他文化更有利于企业家精神(Tan,2002; Mueller&Thomas,2000)。与跨文化的观点相反,没有涉及这些过程的一项研究是针对文化的适应,特别是在具有跨国背景的企业家的背景下。学术界呼吁从文化适应中汲取理论依据,这为创业研究的未来研究奠定了有前途的方法(George&Zahra,2002)。 本文旨在研究文化适应经验对新兴经济环境中跨国企业家的影响,通过对该主题的文献进行全面回顾,企业家通常以其识别机会的能力为特征(Bygrave&Hofer,1991)。基本的企业行为涉及对机会的追求(Stevenson&Jarillo,1990)。但是,如果代理人“企业家”以前曾接触过与他/她本人的原籍文化不同的次要文化,该怎么办(Hong,et al,2000)?文献未能在一定程度上解决企业家活动文化层面这一重要方面的问题,阐明了本文的目的,即提出一种稍微不同的方法来理解以文化理论为根基的机会识别过程。我们认为机会识别是创造过程的特例,可以通过文化后果来证明。经历了适应过程(即:创造性思维,问题解决,逻辑推理,双语和社会资本)的企业家在承认和利用新的创业机会方面发展了一种具有卓越的企业家机敏性和双向思维的认可模式。没有文化适应的经验:土著企业家。 通过采用基于资源的观点,社会资本网络和文化理论的组合概念框架,我们旨在研究跨国企业家在公司一级是否比本地企业家获得了比较优势,特别是在解释“为什么”而不是“如何”方面的过程,或者实际上是试图对机会识别研究中最突出的问题做出贡献:为什么有些人认识机会而有些人却不认识(Baron,2006年; Shane和Venkataraman,2000年; Gaglio和Taub,1992年; Long和McMullan (1984年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号