首页> 外文会议>International Erosion Control Association Conference and expo >Determining Channel-Forming Discharge for River Restoration and Stable Channel Design: A How-To/ How-Not-To Workshop
【24h】

Determining Channel-Forming Discharge for River Restoration and Stable Channel Design: A How-To/ How-Not-To Workshop

机译:确定河流恢复和稳定通道设计的沟道形成排放:如何运行/如何运输

获取原文

摘要

Stream erosion contributes a significant amount of sediment pollution to streams, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. Stable channel design, in which the cross-sectional and plan-view dimensions of a stream are altered to a more stable configuration, has become an increasingly popular method to stabilize degrading streams. Channel-forming discharge is one of the most important parameters required for this type of stable channel design. Three popular methods for approximating channel-forming discharge are bankfull discharge, effective discharge, and the discharge of a given recurrence interval, such as the 2-year flow. Bankfull discharge, defined as the stream flow when the height of the water just reaches the top of the banks, is often used as the channel-forming discharge. Various methods for calculating bankfull discharge include resistance equations, gage station rating curves, and regional power curves. Studies performed on Kansas streams shows tremendous error with some methods for determining bankfull flow. Effective discharge, defined as the discharge that carries the most sediment over the medium to long term, includes information about the sediment transport capacity of a reach and the hydrologic record of the watershed. Effective discharge can be calculated using data from the internet, augmented by field-collected sediment data. Although this method is seen by many to be the most meaningful and correct approximation for channel-forming discharge, not many people know how to calculate it. The recurrence interval of channel-forming discharge varies greatly from region to region. Bankfull discharge on cohesive bed streams in Kansas, for example, was shown to be approximately half of the 2-year flow, while studies performed in other states showed bankfull discharge to more closely match the 10-year flow. A recurrence interval flow should not be used without correlating the return period with several local, stable, streams. This workshop will introduce participants to the most popular methods of channel-forming discharge determination. The benefits, limitations, and drawbacks of each method will be illustrated. Data from stable streams in Kansas will be used to show the applicability and variability of each method, as well as the error produced if a method is misapplied. Participants will then be shown in easy-to-duplicate steps how to calculate effective discharge, using data from the internet and from the field.
机译:流侵蚀为流,河流,湖泊和水库带来了大量的沉积物污染。稳定的通道设计,其中流的横截面和平面图尺寸被改变为更稳定的构造,已成为稳定降解流的越来越流行的方法。沟道形成放电是这种稳定通道设计所需的最重要的参数之一。用于近似通道形成放电的三种流行方法是银行排出,有效放电和给定复发间隔的放电,例如2年流动。当水的高度到达堤岸的水位时,银行排放量被定义为流动流量,通常用作形成沟道形成放电。用于计算银行排放的各种方法包括电阻方程,计量站额定曲线和区域功率曲线。对堪萨斯州的研究表现出巨大的误差,以确定银行流量的一些方法。有效的放电,定义为在长期内携带最沉积物的放电,包括关于陷入困境的沉积物和流域的水文记录的信息。可以使用来自因特网的数据来计算有效放电,由现场收集的沉积物数据增强。虽然许多方法看到了这种方法,但是沟道形成放电的最有意义和正确的近似,但没有多少人知道如何计算它。通道形成放电的复发间隔从地区到区域变化大。例如,堪萨斯州内粘性床溪流的银行放电是大约是2年流程的一半,而在其他国家进行的研究表明银行排放以更紧密地匹配10年的流量。不应使用复发间隔流,而不会将返回时段与几个局部,稳定,流的返回时间相关联。该研讨会将向参与者引入最流行的渠道形成排放测定方法。将说明每个方法的益处,限制和缺点。堪萨斯州稳定流的数据将用于显示每个方法的适用性和可变性,以及如果方法误认,则产生的错误。然后,参与者将以易于重复的步骤显示如何计算有效放电,使用来自Internet和现场的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号