首页> 外文会议>2007年中国国际金融年会 >Specification Analysis of Structural Credit Risk Models
【24h】

Specification Analysis of Structural Credit Risk Models

机译:结构性信用风险模型的规范分析

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we conduct a specification analysis of structural credit risk models, using term structure of credit default swap (CDS) spreads and equity volatility from high-frequency return data. Our study provides consistent econometric estimation of the pricing model parameters and specification tests based on the joint behavior of time-series asset dynamics and cross-sectional pricing errors. Our empirical tests reject strongly the standard Merton (1974) model, the Black and Cox (1976) barrier model, and the Longstaff And Schwartz (1995) model with stochastic interest rates. The double exponential jump-diffusion barrier model (Huang and Huang, 2003) improves significantly over the three models. The best model is the stationary leverage model of Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein (2001), which we cannot reject in more than half of our sample firms. However, our empirical results document the inability of the existing structural models to capture the dynamic behavior of CDS spreads and equity volatility, especially for investment grade names. This points to a potential role of time-varying asset volatility, a feature that is missing in the standard structural models.
机译:在本文中,我们使用信用违约掉期(CDS)利差的期限结构和高频收益数据中的股票波动率,对结构性信用风险模型进行了规范分析。我们的研究基于时间序列资产动力学和横截面定价误差的联合行为,为定价模型参数和规格测试提供了一致的计量经济学估计。我们的经验测试强烈拒绝了具有随机利率的标准Merton(1974)模型,Black and Cox(1976)障碍模型和Longstaff And Schwartz(1995)模型。双指数跳跃扩散障碍模型(Huang and Huang,2003)比这三个模型有显着改善。最好的模型是Collin-Dufresne和Goldstein(2001)的固定杠杆模型,在一半以上的样本公司中,我们不能拒绝这种模型。但是,我们的经验结果表明,现有结构模型无法捕获CDS利差和股票波动性的动态行为,尤其是对于投资级别名称而言。这表明了时变资产波动的潜在作用,这是标准结构模型中缺少的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号