首页> 外文会议>2005年中国国际金融年会 >Law, Economic, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Scandal in a Transition Economy: Insight from China
【24h】

Law, Economic, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Scandal in a Transition Economy: Insight from China

机译:转型经济中的法律,经济,公司治理和公司丑闻:来自中国的见解

获取原文

摘要

There is much higher ratio of firms with the incidence of scandal in a transition economy such as China than in developed economy. This paper empirically examines whether certain corporate governance mechanism are related to the probability of a firm is associated with corporate scandal. We examine Chinese listed firms that are enforced by Chins Security Regulation Committee (CSRC) or stock exchanges. We find that several key governance characteristics are related to the probability of a firm to commit scandal. These include the types controller of the firm, the ownership level of the largest shareholder, the stock holding of the chairman, and ratio of paid supervisors on the Supervisory Committee. Our findings suggest that the governance mechanism especially ownership does matter in avoiding serious corporate scandal in a transition economy such as China. There is no evidence that several other governance characteristics are related to the probability of a firm commit scandal, including the board size, independent directors, the institution ownership, and the size of Supervisory Committee. We also find that the level of a region’s economy development is negatively related to the probability of a firm in the region to commit scandals. As a region’s GDP per capita increase, a firm in the region will be less likely to commit fraud. In addition we find that in a region where the number of commercial cases investigated by procurator is larger, a firm in the region is more likely to commit scandal. These suggest that the procuratorate system is not effective and when legal system is not effective a firm is more likely to commit scandal if there are more firms or people commit fraud or default in commercial contracts in that “neighborhood”. We find a similar but non-linear relation between the number of commercial suits on the court in a province and the probability of a firm to commit scandal in that region. As the number of commercial suits on the court in a province increases, the probability of a firm to commit scandal rises; when the number of commercial suits on the court reach certain level, the probability of a firm to commit scandal falls. It suggests that when the court system becomes effective and more people and firms go to court to protect themselves, the firms will be constraint in committing fraud. Overall we find that in China corporate governance is essential in avoiding corporate scandal. Moreover, in a transition economy the level of economic development and legal system are also related to firm’s probability to commit fraud.
机译:在诸如中国这样的转轨经济体中,发生丑闻的企业比例要比发达经济体高得多。本文从经验上考察了某些公司治理机制是否与公司与公司丑闻相关的可能性有关。我们研究由下巴安全监管委员会(CSRC)或证券交易所执行的中国上市公司。我们发现,几个关键的治理特征与公司实施丑闻的可能性有关。其中包括公司的类型控制者,最大股东的所有权级别,董事长的持股比例以及监事会中有薪监事的比例。我们的研究结果表明,在避免像中国这样的转型经济体中发生严重的公司丑闻时,治理机制(尤其是所有权)确实很重要。没有证据表明其他几个治理特征与公司承诺丑闻的可能性有关,包括董事会规模,独立董事,机构所有权和监事会规模。我们还发现,该地区的经济发展水平与该地区的公司实施丑闻的可能性负相关。随着该地区人均GDP的增长,该地区的公司实施欺诈的可能性将会降低。此外,我们发现,在检察官调查的商业案件数量较大的地区,该地区的公司更有可能犯下丑闻。这些表明,检察院制度是无效的,而在法律制度无效的情况下,如果在那个“社区”中有更多的公司或人们在商业合同中犯下欺诈或违约行为,则一家公司更有可能犯下丑闻。我们发现某省法院的商业诉讼数量与该地区公司发生丑闻的可能性之间存在相似但非线性的关系。随着某省法院提起的商业诉讼案件数量的增加,公司提起丑闻的可能性也随之增加。当法院提起的商业诉讼数量达到一定水平时,公司实施丑闻的可能性就会下降。它表明,当法院系统有效并且有更多的人和公司出庭保护自己时,这些公司将受到欺诈的约束。总体而言,我们发现在中国,公司治理对于避免公司丑闻至关重要。此外,在转轨经济中,经济发展水平和法律制度也与企业实施欺诈的可能性有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号