首页> 外文会议>Safety and Reliability >Application of functional hazard assessment in railway signalling
【24h】

Application of functional hazard assessment in railway signalling

机译:功能危害评估在铁路信号系统中的应用

获取原文

摘要

Functional hazard analysis or functional hazard assessment (FHA) is an established and recommended method of risk analysis and allocation of safety targets in aviation, see e.g. JAR 25.1309 (JAA 2000), SAE ARP 4754/4761 (SAE 1996a, b) or EUROCONTROL Safety Assessment Methodology (EUROCONTROL 2000). It supports the international harmonisation of safety requirements and interoperability of products in aviation. Even a cursory glance reveals many similarities between aviation and railways. Because moving vehicles, whether trains or aeroplanes, are controlled by stationary control centres (interlockings, air traffic management centres), the idea of applying FHA to railways is an obvious one. On closer examination, however, a few differences become apparent, not only in the analogy between aviation and railways, but also in the use of FHA for large aeroplanes (SAE 1996a, b) and air traffic management (ATM) systems (EUROCONTROL 2000). This paper contrasts FHA in SAE and EUROCONTROL and merges the two approaches to form a single procedure. The result is compared with the risk analysis approaches in railways, in particular EN 50126 (CENELEC 2000) and EN 50129 (CENELEC 2002), both from the point of view of standards and practical applications. The pros and cons of the use of FHA in railways are discussed. In fact the application of FHA in the field of railways offers many benefits, which could have a considerable impact on products and standards, but the feasibility cannot be demonstrated merely on the basis of theoretical considerations. There was thus a need for a pilot application of FHA in railway signalling. The initial result of such a feasibility study are described here.
机译:功能危险分析或功能危险评估(FHA)是一种建立的风险分析和水平安全目标的建立和推荐方法,见图。 JAR 25.1309(JAA 2000),SAE ARP 4754/4761(SAE 1996A,B)或EuroOcontrol安全评估方法(Eurocontrol 2000)。它支持国际安全要求和航空产品互操作性的协调。即使是练习型浏览,航空和铁路之间也揭示了许多相似之处。由于移动车辆,无论是列车或飞机,是否由固定控制中心(互锁器,空中交通管理中心)控制,所以将FHA应用于铁路的想法是一个明显的想法。然而,仔细检查,差异很明显,不仅在航空和铁路之间的类比中,而且在使用FHA的大型飞机(SAE 1996A,B)和空中交通管理(ATM)系统(Eurocontrol 2000)中的使用。本文对着SAE和Eurocontrol的FHA对比,并合并两种方法来形成单一程序。结果与铁路中的风险分析方法进行比较,特别是EN 50126(Cenelec 2000)和EN 50129(Cenelec 2002),无论是标准和实际应用。讨论了在铁路中使用FHA的利弊。事实上,FHA在铁路领域的应用提供了许多好处,这可能对产品和标准产生相当大的影响,但不能仅基于理论考虑来证明可行性。因此,需要在铁路信令中的FHA试验应用。这里描述了这种可行性研究的初始结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号