首页> 外文会议>Safety and Reliability >Practical reliability assurance through modelling and DRACAS
【24h】

Practical reliability assurance through modelling and DRACAS

机译:通过建模和DRACAS保证实用的可靠性

获取原文

摘要

In recent years the subject of reliability in its truest sense (numerical evaluation) has been under considerable criticism by some Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) commentators. This is considered to be due in part to poor application by many practitioners and a lack of understanding of the benefits of many of the reliability engineering techniques available. This is particularly true of the understanding of the value of R&M modelling by managers and decision makers within the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD). The author considers that it is important that the R&M community re-establish the reasons for and benefits of R&M modelling and "the numbers game" as it is sometimes called by its detractors. This paper is particularly focused on the recent successful application of a rigorous mechanism to assist contractual agreement of R&M (or availability) performance by combination of an availability Model with an effective Data Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (DRACAS).
机译:近年来,一些可靠性和可维护性(R&M)评论员对最真实意义上的可靠性(数字评估)进行了批评。认为这部分是由于许多从业者的应用不佳,以及对许多可用的可靠性工程技术的好处缺乏了解。英国国防部(MoD)的管理人员和决策者对R&M建模的价值的理解尤其如此。作者认为,R&M社区重新建立R&M建模和“数字游戏”的理由和好处是很重要的,因为它有时会遭到批评者的称呼。本文特别关注最近成功应用严格的机制,通过将可用性模型与有效的数据报告,分析和纠正措施系统(DRACAS)相结合,来协助R&M(或可用性)绩效的合同协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号