首页> 外文会议>Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2003. IGARSS '03. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International >Validation of MODIS, VEGETATION, and GOES+SSM/I snow cover products over Canada based on surface snow depth observations
【24h】

Validation of MODIS, VEGETATION, and GOES+SSM/I snow cover products over Canada based on surface snow depth observations

机译:根据地表雪深观测,验证加拿大的MODIS,VEGETATION和GOES + SSM / I雪覆盖产品

获取原文

摘要

The rate and pattern of snow melt control both hydrological and ecological factors. Snow cover maps derived by different satellite sensors can differ considerably from surface observations due to different spatial resolutions and snow cover classification algorithms. This article addresses issues related to the validation of three daily snow cover products over Canada: MODIS and GOES+SSM/I snow maps derived at 500m and 4km resolution, respectively for 2001, and VEGETATION snow maps derived at 1km resolution for 2000. The validation is based on surface snow depth observations from almost two thousand meteorological stations across Canada. The analysis is performed on a daily basis for the period of six months (January-June). A land cover map of Canada at 1km resolution is used to relate the differences within the validation to land cover types. The SPOT product shows an average agreement of 83% ad considerably high percentage of omission error. The MODIS and GOES+SSM/I products have similar percentage average agreements, 93% and 92%, respectively. Generally, less agreement is seen within the evergreen forest cover types, earlier in the snow season and during snow melt. The MODIS product exhibits a high percentage commission error for evergreen forests. The GOES+SSM/I product shows relatively similar ratios of omission and commission errors for all land cover types except deciduous forest.
机译:融雪的速度和方式控制着水文和生态因素。由于不同的空间分辨率和积雪分类算法,由不同的卫星传感器得出的积雪地图可能与地面观测有很大差异。本文讨论了与加拿大境内三种日常积雪产品的验证有关的问题:分别在2001年以500m和4km的分辨率导出的MODIS和GOES + SSM / I雪图,以及在2000年以1km的分辨率导出的VEGETATION雪图。基于加拿大近两千个气象站的地面积雪深度观测结果。每天进行六个月(1月至6月)的分析。使用加拿大1 km分辨率的土地覆盖图将验证范围内的差异与土地覆盖类型相关联。 SPOT产品的平均一致性为83%,而遗漏错误的百分比很高。 MODIS和GOES + SSM / I产品的平均协议百分比相似,分别为93%和92%。通常,在常绿森林覆盖类型中,在雪季较早和融雪期间,一致性较低。 MODIS产品对常绿森林表现出很高的百分比佣金误差。 GOES + SSM / I产品对除落叶林以外的所有土地覆盖类型均显示出相对相似的遗漏和委托误差比率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号