首页> 外文会议>IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference, 2001. Joint 9th >An even more realistic (non-associative) logic and its relation to psychology of human reasoning
【24h】

An even more realistic (non-associative) logic and its relation to psychology of human reasoning

机译:更加现实的(非关联性)逻辑及其与人类推理心理学的关系

获取原文

摘要

If we know the degrees of certainty (subjective probabilities) p(S/sub 1/) and p(S/sub 2/) in two statements S/sub 1/ and S/sub 2/, then the possible values of p(S/sub 1/&S/sub 2/) form an interval p=[max(p/sub 1/+p/sub 2/-1,0), min(p/sub 1/,p/sub 2/)]. As a numerical estimate, it is natural to use a mid-point p of this interval; this mid-point is a mathematical expectation of p(S/sub 1/&S/sub 2/) over a uniform (second-order) distribution on all possible probability distributions. This mid-point operation & is not associative. We show that the upper bound on the difference a&(b&c)-(a&b)&c is 1/9, so if the size of the corresponding granules is /spl ges/1/9, we will not notice this associativity. This may explain the famous 7/spl plusmn/2 law, according to which we use no more than 9 granules.
机译:如果我们在两个语句S / sub 1 /和S / sub 2 /中知道确定度(主观概率)p(S / sub 1 /)和p(S / sub 2 /),则p( S / sub 1 /&S / sub 2 /)形成一个间隔p = [max(p / sub 1 / + p / sub 2 / -1,0),min(p / sub 1 /,p / sub 2 /) ]。作为数值估计,很自然地使用此间隔的中点p;该中点是对所有可能概率分布的均匀(二阶)分布上的p(S / sub 1 /&S / sub 2 /)的数学期望。此中点操作&不具有关联性。我们表明,差异a&(b&c)-(a&b)&c的上限为1/9,因此,如果相应颗粒的大小为/ spl ges / 1/9,我们将不会注意到这种关联性。这可以解释著名的7 / spl plusmn / 2定律,根据该定律,我们使用不超过9个颗粒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号