首页> 外文会议>World multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics;SCI 2000 >A Meeting and A Whiteboard (describing the power to speak)
【24h】

A Meeting and A Whiteboard (describing the power to speak)

机译:会议和白板(描述发言权)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this paper is to discuss the use of ethnography in studies of software development practice, by way of an example, and the development of questions, a working hypothesis and discussion points from observational material. The example is small - a single meeting that took place between three members of the software development team, working in-house, on a large insurance system. This project involved a high degree of user participation, and the company was employing object technology, and use cases for the first time. There were two additional participants in that meeting, a consultant who was employed to teach the writing of use cases to the user group, and myself, as ethnographer, employed by the consultant. Very briefly, ethnography involves attending to the cultural details and dynamics of self-described communities. Such study involves observation, interviews, and the analysis of practices, artefacts, and documentation. The most significant feature of ethnography is the primacy of the written account For an overview of the uses of ethnography in IT see Beynon-Davies, 1995. The example below is presented as three different accounts - my initial notes, another participant's view of the meeting, and a more developed account which begins to ask questions, and suggest a working hypothesis for discussion. The different accounts reflect the perspectival nature of this kind of work, and its quality of developing over time, and through discussion. The suggestion made at the end, is a suggestion made on the basis of a careful consideration of the event in question. It is no more, or less, than that, and is up for testing and discussion. What I hope to show here is that that multiple facets of the mundane activities with which we are all too familiar, profoundly shape those activities and consequently influence what we can do, and cannot, and how we get to do those things. Ethnography provides one way of addressing these aspects of day-to-day working life, making the implicit explicit, and brings with it a particular set of options and constraints.
机译:本文的目的是通过示例讨论民族志在软件开发实践研究中的使用,以及问题的发展,工作假设和观察资料的讨论要点。这个例子很小-在大型保险系统上内部工作的软件开发团队的三名成员之间举行了一次会议。该项目涉及高度的用户参与,并且该公司首次采用了对象技术和用例。那次会议上还有另外两个参与者,一个是受雇向用户组教授用例编写工作的顾问,另一个是我作为民族志专家的人。简而言之,人种学涉及关注自我描述的社区的文化细节和动态。此类研究涉及观察,访谈以及对实践,文物和文档的分析。人种学的最重要特征是书面记录的首要性。有关人种学在IT中的用途的概述,请参见Beynon-Davies,1995年。下面的示例以三个不同的帐户呈现-我的初稿,另一位与会者对会议的看法,以及一个更完善的帐户,该帐户开始提出问题,并提出了可行的假设进行讨论。不同的叙述反映了这种工作的透视性,以及随着时间的推移以及通过讨论其发展的质量。最后提出的建议是在仔细考虑所讨论事件的基础上提出的建议。它不多于或少于此,可以进行测试和讨论。我希望在这里显示的是,我们都非常熟悉的平凡活动的多个方面,深刻地塑造了这些活动,因此影响了我们可以做,不能做的事情以及我们如何去做这些事情。人种学为解决日常工作生活的这些方面提供了一种方法,使隐性变得更加明确,并带来了一系列特殊的选择和限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号