【24h】

FUEL CELLS: SIZZLE OR FIZZLE?

机译:燃料电池:是喷还是喷?

获取原文

摘要

The Innovator's Dilemma makes a great case for the fuel cell, though fuel cells are never mentioned. Fuel cells are simpler and smaller than conventional generation equipment. Fuel cells appeal right now mostly to a niche market―customers who are located in remote areas or do not have nearby distribution access. Utilities today are focused on their established customer base like never before. Those existing customers are not clamoring for fuel cells. The niche markets are not that attractive to utilities. The electric power market is a mature market. Introducing new technologies into the market carries risks. There may be NO value network in the marketplace for the product. There may be an unexpected shift in the value network such as the Arab oil embargo or the passage of legislation. As with ZapMail, utilities might attempt to hold onto market share by owning fuel cells and selling fuel-cell generated power, when in fact, the technology could become affordable for self-generation. Fuel cells have the potential to be an extremely successful technological innovation. There are risks, however. This observer will side with those who believe the risks of losing out if fuel cells are a success is a greater risk than losing some investment if fuel cells fizzle.
机译:尽管从未提及燃料电池,但创新者的困境为燃料电池提供了很好的案例。燃料电池比传统的发电设备更简单,更小。燃料电池目前主要吸引特殊市场-偏远地区或没有附近分销渠道的客户。如今,公用事业从未像现在这样专注于已建立的客户群。那些现有客户并不热衷于使用燃料电池。利基市场对公用事业没有那么大的吸引力。电力市场是一个成熟的市场。将新技术引入市场会带来风险。产品市场上可能没有价值网络。价值网络可能发生意想不到的变化,例如阿拉伯石油禁运或立法通过。与ZapMail一样,公用事业公司可能试图通过拥有燃料电池并出售燃料电池产生的电力来保持市场份额,而事实上,该技术对于自发电而言可能变得负担得起。燃料电池有可能成为一项极其成功的技术创新。但是存在风险。该观察员将与那些认为燃料电池成功失败的风险要比燃料电池失败时损失一些投资的风险更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号