首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific conference on computional mechanics;APCOM'99 >Imposition of essential boundary conditions in the element-free galerkin method
【24h】

Imposition of essential boundary conditions in the element-free galerkin method

机译:无元素加勒金方法的基本边界条件的施加

获取原文

摘要

Three methods for the imposition of essential boundary conditions in the element-free Galerkin method: (A) a coupled FEM-EFG approach, (B) the use of singular weighting functions, and (C) a new method which uses a coupled FEM-EFG approach and that employs singular weighting functions, are compared. Convergence of displacement (L_2 error norm) and displacement derivatives (energy norm) is analyzed for a series of two-dimensional numerical examples including a constant stress field patch test, a linear stress field patch test, and the bending of a cantilever beam with end loading. A comparison of solution accuracy and convergence rate for each of the three methods shows that the coupled FEM-EFG method provides the highest level of overall accuracy for the problems under consideration. However, the convergence rates for each of the three methods are similar. It is shown that the addition of the FEM coupling to method B does not significantly improve results with regards to both solution accuracy or convergence rate.
机译:在无元素Galerkin方法中施加基本边界条件的三种方法:(A)耦合FEM-EFG方法,(B)奇异加权函数的使用,以及(C)使用耦合FEM-F的新方法比较了采用奇异加权函数的EFG方法。针对一系列二维数值示例,分析了位移(L_2误差范数)和位移导数(能量范数)的收敛性,包括恒定应力场补丁测试,线性应力场补丁测试以及悬臂梁端部弯曲的一系列二维数值示例。加载中。三种方法中每种方法的求解精度和收敛速度的比较表明,耦合FEM-EFG方法为所考虑的问题提供了最高水平的整体精度。但是,这三种方法中的每一种的收敛速度都相似。结果表明,在方法B上增加FEM耦合并不能显着改善结果的求解精度或收敛速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号