首页> 外文会议>Conference on enabling technology for simulation science >Ensuring thorough comparison of modeling and simulation (MS) results with experimental and test observations
【24h】

Ensuring thorough comparison of modeling and simulation (MS) results with experimental and test observations

机译:确保将建模和仿真(M&S)结果与实验和测试观察结果进行全面比较

获取原文

摘要

Abstract: The Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) process is integral to M&S development. Robust Verification and Validation (V&V) provides the confidence in the estimate of system performance derived from the simulation. There are five fundamental steps in the VV&A process: Requirements Validation; Conceptual Model Validation; Design Verification; Implementation Verification; and Results Validation. This paper addresses issues associated with Results Validation which is a comparison of M&S predictions with experimental (test) observations (measurements) for the purpose of ensuring the fidelity of the M&S representations of the system. Comparison of model predictions with test observations (measurements) may or may not be a straightforward process. We discuss the comparison of the experimental results (e.g. a flight test) with the output of a model (as represented by a simulation), we consider the elements of the `system' and `model,' and directly address the impact of the model abstraction techniques employed.!9
机译:摘要:验证,确认和认证(VV&A)过程是M&S开发不可或缺的部分。稳健的验证和确认(V&V)为仿真得出的系统性能评估提供了信心。 VV&A流程有五个基本步骤:需求验证;概念模型验证;设计验证;实施验证;和结果验证。本文讨论了与结果验证相关的问题,该结果是将M&S预测与实验(测试)观察值(度量)进行比较,以确保系统的M&S表示的真实性。将模型预测与测试观察值(度量)进行比较可能会,也可能不是一个简单的过程。我们讨论将实验结果(例如飞行测试)与模型输出(以模拟表示)的比较,考虑“系统”和“模型”的要素,并直接解决模型的影响所采用的抽象技术!9

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号