【24h】

Comparison of defibrillation resistance of various diameter electrodes

机译:各种直径电极的除颤电阻比较

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine the difference in the resistance of a custom 3 Fr. defibrillation electrode with that of a 9.6 Fr. defibrillation electrode in the canine. An additional objective was to compare these results with those obtained using tank tests and an analytical model of the electrodes. Although thinner leads can be made more reliable and may provide clinical benefit, their increased defibrillation resistance could negatively impact defibrillation efficacy. Therefore, in this study the defibrillation resistance was measured for various electrode diameters in the canine, a tank, and an analytical model to better understand the resistance behavior of defibrillation electrodes. The resistance was the electrostatic resistance in the model, and the leading edge resistance of a defibrillation shock in both the tank and the canine. The resistance increased up to 13 ohms when the diameter was reduced from 0.120" to 0.016" with similar results in the tank, the model, and the canine. The model correctly calculated the differences in the resistance despite the fact that it contained no consideration for electrochemical and interfacial components. Therefore, these elements are unlikely to have a significant effect on defibrillation resistance.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定常规3 Fr的电阻差异。 9.6 Fr的除颤电极。犬的除颤电极。另一个目的是将这些结果与使用储罐测试和电极分析模型获得的结果进行比较。尽管可以使更细的导线更可靠并可以提供临床收益,但是增加的除颤电阻可能会对除颤效果产生负面影响。因此,在这项研究中,对犬,水箱中各种电极直径的除颤电阻进行了测量,并分析了模型,以更好地了解除颤电极的电阻行为。电阻是模型中的静电电阻,是罐和犬中除颤电击的前沿电阻。当直径从0.120“减小到0.016”时,电阻增加到13欧姆,在水箱,模型和犬牙上得到类似的结果。尽管该模型没有考虑电化学和界面成分,但该模型可以正确计算出电阻的差异。因此,这些元素不太可能对除颤性产生显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号