首页> 外文会议>AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference >Effect of Angle of Attack Displays on Approach Stability
【24h】

Effect of Angle of Attack Displays on Approach Stability

机译:攻角显示的影响稳定性

获取原文

摘要

Although piloting an aircraft throughout history has remained essentially the same, the information that the pilot must interpret and the interface through which they accomplish control has changed dramatically. Examples such as autopilots, flight directors, and glass cockpits to name a few have necessitated that pilots interface with their aircraft in a ways not originally foreseen. Despite all of these technology advancements, many of which are designed to help with aircraft control, a loss of control due to stall/spin encounters continues to be a primary killer in both general and commercial aviation alike. In the presented research, the utilization of an Angle of Attack (AOA) indicator was assessed to determine if the stability of the approach was impacted with varying levels of exposure to an angle of attack display and education on the concepts of angle of attack and the mechanisms by which the chosen display illustrates the angle of attack during various phases of flight. While the primary objective of an AOA display is to provide a current understanding of the current AOA and its proximity to the critical AOA to prevent unintentional aerodynamic stalls, there are potentially other benefits and additional insights that can be provided to the pilot. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis for pilots to conduct a stabilized approach both with and without AOA displays. Four study design groups participated in the study from three different universities and with three different aircraft flown. Participants were recruited from both the local general aviation population and the flight schools of the three participating universities. In order to measure the stability of the approach, the Flight Path Angle (FPA) was measured at 1 second intervals along the approach utilizing a stand-alone Attitude Heading and Reference System (AHRS). The FPAs between the 1 second intervals was determined and the absolute value of the difference between a given second and its subsequent second value was calculated. The sum of the variations in the FPAs for the last 30 seconds was calculated and then compared across all participant groups. Here we report the findings of how the utilization of an AOA display affected approach stability and how the landscape of AOA accessibility in the GA market has developed in recent years.
机译:虽然在整个历史中驾驶飞机仍然是相同的,但是导频必须解释的信息和他们完成控制的接口发生了显着改变。诸如自动驾驶仪,飞行董事和玻璃驾驶舱的示例,以命名为少数人必须以未原始预见的方式与飞机接口。尽管所有这些技术进步,但其中许多都旨在帮助飞机控制,由于摊位/旋转遭遇导致的控制丧失仍然是一般和商业航空的主要杀手。在提出的研究中,评估了一种攻击角度(AOA)指标的利用,以确定该方法的稳定性是否受到不同程度的暴露于攻击角度和攻角概念的攻击角度和教育所选择的显示器的机制示出了飞行中各阶段的攻击角度。虽然AOA显示器的主要目标是提供对当前的AOA及其对关键AOA的接近以防止无意的空气动力学档位的理解,但是可以提供给飞行员的可能其他益处和附加洞察力。本研究的主要目的是对飞行员进行比较分析,以便在没有AOA显示器和没有AOA的情况下进行稳定的方法。四个学习设计团体参加了三所不同大学的研究,以及三种不同的飞机飞行。从当地一般航空人口和三所参与大学的飞行学校招募了参与者。为了测量该方法的稳定性,沿着采用独立姿态标题和参考系统(AHRS)的方法以1秒间隔测量飞行路径角(FPA)。确定了1秒间隔之间的FPA,并计算给定第二及其随后的第二值之间的差异的绝对值。计算过去30秒的FPA变量的总和,然后在所有参与者组中进行比较。在这里,我们报告了如何利用AOA显示影响的方法稳定性以及GA市场的AOA可访问性景观的研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号