首页> 外文会议>International fire science engineering conference >ASSESSMENT OF THE GAS COOLING CAPABILITIES OF COMPRESSED AIR FOAM SYSTEMS IN FUEL- AND VENTILATION-CONTROLLED COMPARTMENT FIRES
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF THE GAS COOLING CAPABILITIES OF COMPRESSED AIR FOAM SYSTEMS IN FUEL- AND VENTILATION-CONTROLLED COMPARTMENT FIRES

机译:燃油和通风控制室燃料中压缩空气泡沫系统气体冷却能力的评估

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess the cooling capabilities of the compressed air foamsystem (CAFS), as an alternative suppression agent to water mist, in fuel- and ventilation-controlledcompartment fires. Two compartment fire behaviour training (CFBT) cells with dimensions of 12mlong × 2.4m wide × 2.4m high and 6m long × 2.4m wide × 2.4m long were used, respectively, for thefuel- and ventilation-controlled experiments. Wooden pallets and chip boards were used as fuels. Inaddition to the CAFS, tests using water mist (the traditional suppression agent) were also conducted.Tests were video recorded and the development of temperature inside the units was also recordedusing thermocouples. A comparative analysis of the results by the CAFS and water mist is conductedbased on the temperature evolution histories and observations from the videos. The results indicatethat the CAFS is more efficient in fire-fighting fuel-controlled fires, whereas for ventilation-controlledfires no noticeable difference is found between the CAFS and water mist. It is however noted that theCAFS does not contribute to or cause a backdraft in ventilation-controlled experiments.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估压缩空气泡沫的冷却能力 系统(CAFS),作为水雾的替代抑制剂,在燃料和通风控制下 车厢起火。两个大小为12m的隔室射击行为训练(CFBT)单元 分别使用长×2.4m宽×2.4m高和6m长×2.4m宽×2.4m长。 燃料和通风控制的实验。木托盘和刨花板被用作燃料。在 除CAFS外,还进行了使用水雾(传统抑制剂)的测试。 记录测试视频并记录单元内部的温度变化 使用热电偶。对CAFS和水雾的结果进行了比较分析 基于温度演化历史和视频中的观察结果。结果表明 CAFS在以燃料为燃料的灭火中更有效,而在以通风为控制的燃料中则更为有效 着火时,CAFS和水雾之间没有发现明显差异。但是请注意, 在通风控制的实验中,CAFS不会导致或引起回风。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号