【24h】

The Problems with Usability Testing

机译:可用性测试的问题

获取原文

摘要

Most books discussing User Experience (UX) or usability often dedicate sections or entire chapters to an introduction to usability testing as a valid and reliable method to identify issues that occur within a given interface or system [e.g., 1, 3, 6, 10]. Indeed, there is an entire book written about specific methods and application of usability testing [e.g., 6J. Despite the plethora of books discussing usability testing, Rolf Molich and his colleagues have found variance in the usability issues found even amongst agency experts [e.g., 12, 13, 14]. These variances suggest that usability testing might often be inconsistently applied across the UX field. From our experience in industry, we put forth in this paper commonly problems with usability testing, which can result in the inconsistencies applied across the UX field. These problems are contrasted against suggested protocol found in literature, which provides a basis to support discussion of solutions and provide recommendations to new researchers.
机译:大多数讨论用户体验(UX)或可用性的书通常将章节或整章专门介绍可用性测试,将其作为一种有效且可靠的方法来识别给定接口或系统中发生的问题[例如1、3、6、10] 。确实,有一整本书写着关于可用性测试的特定方法和应用的书[例如6J。尽管有大量讨论可用性测试的书籍,但Rolf Molich和他的同事发现,即使在代理商专家中也发现了可用性问题上的差异[例如12、13、14]。这些差异表明可用性测试可能经常在UX领域不一致地应用。根据我们的行业经验,我们在本文中提出了可用性测试中的常见问题,这可能导致在UX领域应用不一致。这些问题与文献中的建议方案形成对比,后者为支持解决方案的讨论和向新研究人员提供建议提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号