首页> 外文会议>International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning >Interval Temporal Logic Model Checking: The Border Between Good and Bad HS Fragments
【24h】

Interval Temporal Logic Model Checking: The Border Between Good and Bad HS Fragments

机译:间隔时间逻辑模型检查:良好和坏HS碎片之间的边界

获取原文

摘要

The model checking problem has thoroughly been explored in the context of standard point-based temporal logics, such as LTL, CTL, and CTL ? , whereas model checking for interval temporal logics has been brought to the attention only very recently. In this paper, we prove that the model checking problem for the logic of Allen's relations started-by and finished-by is highly intractable, as it can be proved to be EXPSPACE-hard. Such a lower bound immediately propagates to the full Halpern and Shoham's modal logic of time intervals (HS). In contrast, we show that other noteworthy HS fragments, namely, Propositional Neighbourhood Logic extended with modalities for the Allen relation starts (resp., finishes) and its inverse started-by (resp., finished-by), turn out to have-maybe unexpectedly-the same complexity as LTL (i.e., they are PSPACE-complete), thus joining the group of other already studied, well-behaved albeit less expressive, HS fragments.
机译:在基于标准点的时间逻辑的上下文中探讨了模型检查问题,例如LTL,CTL和CTL? ,虽然最近仅引起了间隔时间逻辑的模型检查。在本文中,我们证明了Allen的关系逻辑的模型检查问题是高度棘手的,因为它可以证明它是硬的。这种下限立即传播到全Halpern和Shoham的时间间隔(HS)的模态逻辑。相比之下,我们展示了其他值得注意的HS碎片,即,与艾伦关系的模式扩展的命题邻域逻辑开始(RESP。,完成)及其反向(RESP。,完成),结果是 - 可能出乎意料地 - 与LTL相同的复杂性(即,它们是PSPACE-COMPLETY),从而加入了已经研究的其他群体,表现良好的表现不佳,HS碎片。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号