首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems >A study on IMU-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning
【24h】

A study on IMU-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning

机译:基于IMU的深度学习和传统机器学习的人类活动识别研究

获取原文

摘要

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been an increasingly popular range to do researches which stems from the ubiquitous computing. And lately, identifying activities during daily life has become one of more and more challenges. Subsequently, more and more methods can be used in the recognition of human activities such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forests (RF) which are the representatives of Traditional Machine Learning (TML) and also some Deep Learning (DL) methods like Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). However, neither TML nor DL is suitable for all kinds of situations and various datasets. As a result, we would like to explore more about such consequences. In this paper, we discover a discrepancy and phenomenon that different sizes of collected HAR datasets may produce influences on the effectiveness of traditional machine learning methods as well as the deep learning architectures. We conduct experiments on two kinds of different datasets USC-HAD and WISDM with the best accuracy nearly 90% in DL and 87% in TML. Due to the consequences of the experiments we give a conclusion on the individual heterogeneity problems of the HAR datasets–when dealing with the HAR datasets of small scales, the TML structures are more suitable. However, conversely, when the datasets have large amount of datasets. Specifically, DL approaches such as CNN and LSTM are more sensible choices.
机译:人类活动识别(HAR)已经成为越来越普遍的研究范围,其源于无处不在的计算。最近,识别日常生活中的活动已成为越来越多的挑战之一。随后,越来越多的方法可以用于人类活动的识别,例如支持向量机(SVM),代表传统机器学习(TML)的随机森林(RF)以及一些深度学习(DL)方法,例如卷积神经网络(CNN)和递归神经网络(RNN)。但是,TML和DL均不适用于各种情况和各种数据集。因此,我们想探索更多有关此类后果的信息。在本文中,我们发现了一个差异和现象,即收集到的不同大小的HAR数据集可能会对传统机器学习方法以及深度学习架构的有效性产生影响。我们在两种不同的数据集USC-HAD和WISDM上进行了实验,其中DL的最高精度接近90%,TML的准确率高达87%。由于实验的结果,我们对HAR数据集的各个异质性问题给出了结论-当处理小规模的HAR数据集时,TML结构更适合。但是,相反,当数据集具有大量数据集时。具体地说,诸如CNN和LSTM之类的DL方法是更明智的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号