首页> 外文会议>International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering >Comparison of two test methods for determination of broadband sound power levels emitted by products: a reverberation chamber method versus a hemi-anechoic chamber method
【24h】

Comparison of two test methods for determination of broadband sound power levels emitted by products: a reverberation chamber method versus a hemi-anechoic chamber method

机译:产品测定宽带声功率水平的两种试验方法的比较:混响室方法与半透道室方法

获取原文

摘要

The use of sound power levels in specification, labeling, and design of noise-emitting products has a distinct advantage over the use of sound pressure levels in that sound power levels can be considered a property of the device and not of the test environment or distance away from the device. Ideally, end-users of the product should be able to compare sound power levels as a product-selection consideration or develop maximum allowable sound power level specifications for given applications, independent of the test method used to determine sound power levels or particular laboratory performing the testing. With that goal in mind, two commonly used methods for determining sound power levels - a reverberation chamber method and a hemi-anechoic chamber method - are compared, with respect to correlation of determined results as well as practical considerations (test time, measurement instrumentation required, and chamber configuration).
机译:在说明书,标签和噪声发射产品设计中使用声音功率水平在使用声压水平的情况下具有明显的优势,因为声音功率水平可以被视为设备的属性而不是测试环境或距离远离设备。理想情况下,产品的最终用户应该能够将声音功率水平与产品选择考虑或开发给定应用程序的最大允许的声音功率级规格进行比较,而是独立于用于确定声音功率水平或特定实验室执行的测试方法测试。通过考虑到这一目标,将两个用于确定声音功率电平的常用方法 - 相对于所确定的结果以及实际考虑的相关性(测试时间,所需测量仪器的实际考虑而进行比较 - 混响室方法和半透道室方法。和腔室配置)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号