首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation >A Systematic Literature Review On Digital Evidence Admissibility: Methodologies, Challenges and Research Directions
【24h】

A Systematic Literature Review On Digital Evidence Admissibility: Methodologies, Challenges and Research Directions

机译:关于数字证据可采性的系统文献综述:方法,挑战和研究方向

获取原文

摘要

Admissibility of Evidence is the eligibility of particular pieces of evidence for inception as part of the evidence in a case. Admissibility means the character or quality to be accepted and allowed to be presented or introduced as evidence in court. To be admissible means capable of being legally admitted or allowable or permissible as evidence or worthy of gaining entry or being admitted. This study focus on carrying out a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on Digital Evidence Admissibility. The methodology employed in this study was the querying of four academic database resources systematically and fundamentally identifying kinds of literature related to digital evidence admissibility through identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion criteria. The advantage of this study is revealing the gap and trends in digital evidence admissibility as the article published between the period of 2015 through 2018 are relative with the following variation 64%, 21% 7%, for the following respectively, IEEE, Science Direct, ACM Digital library, as well as Research Gate. While at the period under review, 2019 is yet to record publication in the field of research in Digital Evidence Admissibility. The period under review witnessed a low academic publication in the field of Digital Evidence admissibility. This research will aid in projecting future research in the aforementioned research field.
机译:证据的可采性是特定证据在案件中作为证据一部分的资格。可采性是指在法庭上被接受并允许作为证据提供或引入的特征或品质。被接纳是指能够合法地被接纳,被允许或被允许作为证据或值得获得进入或被接纳的证据。这项研究的重点是对数字证据可采性进行系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。本研究采用的方法是系统地查询四个学术数据库资源,并通过识别,筛选,资格和纳入标准从根本上确定与数字证据可采性有关的各种文献。这项研究的优势在于揭示了数字证据可采性的差距和趋势,因为在2015年至2018年之间发表的文章相对而言分别具有以下变化,分别为IEEE,Science Direct, ACM数字图书馆以及Research Gate。在本报告所述期间,2019年尚未在数字证据可采性研究领域记录出版情况。在本报告所述期间,数字证据可采性领域的学术出版物很少。这项研究将有助于预测上述研究领域中的未来研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号