首页> 外文会议>IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications >Combined Cooling Heating and Power System Design and Capacity Configuration taking into account Solar Photovoltaic
【24h】

Combined Cooling Heating and Power System Design and Capacity Configuration taking into account Solar Photovoltaic

机译:考虑太阳能光伏的冷却供热和电力系统组合设计和容量配置

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, a structure with energy storage of multi-complementary Combined Cooling Heating and Power (CCHP) systems was presented, including photovoltaic panels (PV) generation, power generation unit (PGU), boiler, energy storage device, electric chiller, absorption chiller. Combined with the full working condition model of PGU and other equipment models, the capacity optimization configuration model of the system was established, and the operation mode of Following Electrical Load (FEL) with energy storage was designed. The economic, energy and environmental properties are the comprehensive objectives of the system. The Genetic algorithm (GA) is used to solve the problem and the capacity of different equipment is obtained. Taking a commercial office building in Jinan as an example, compared with the goals obtained by the traditional non-energy storage CCHP system under FEL and Following Thermal Load (FTL) operation modes. The results show that non-energy storage CCHP system in the FEL operation mode Primary Energy Saving Rate (PESR) and Annual Cost Savings Rate (ACSR) is increased by 15.53% and 28.65% respectively, compared with the FTL operation mode. After the energy storage is increased, compared with the FEL non-energy storage system, PESR, ACSR and CO2Emission Reduction Ratio (ERR) increased by 4.61%, 1.97%, and 3.18%, respectively, and the economics was the best under FTL operation mode.
机译:本文提出了一种具有多互补式冷热电联产(CCHP)系统的储能结构,包括光伏电池板(PV)发电,发电单元(PGU),锅炉,储能装置,电制冷机,吸收器冷却器。结合PGU的全工况模型和其他设备模型,建立了系统的容量优化配置模型,设计了蓄能跟随电负荷运行模式。经济,能源和环境属性是系统的综合目标。使用遗传算法(GA)解决了该问题,并获得了不同设备的容量。以济南某商业办公楼为例,与传统的非储能CCHP系统在FEL和跟随热负荷(FTL)运行模式下获得的目标进行了比较。结果表明,与FTL运行模式相比,在FEL运行模式下的非储能CCHP系统一次节能率(PESR)和年度成本节省率(ACSR)分别提高了15.53%和28.65%。储能增加后,与FEL非储能系统相比,PESR,ACSR和CO 2 减少排放率(ERR)分别增加了4.61%,1.97%和3.18%,在FTL运行模式下,经济性是最好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号