首页> 外文会议>International conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering >Rupture Failure Modes in Analyses of Stability of Soil and Rock Slopes
【24h】

Rupture Failure Modes in Analyses of Stability of Soil and Rock Slopes

机译:土石质边坡稳定性分析中的破裂破坏模式

获取原文

摘要

Methods of stability analyses of slopes, such as limit analysis or the limit equilibrium method, require postulation of the pattern of failure and the mode of material yielding. They typically do so by assuming the shear-type material failure (mode) along kinematic discontinuities (pattern). Observations of slope failures, however, lead to the conclusion that both soils and rocks often display a rupture-type mode of failure with large separation components of displacements, in addition to the shear-type failure. Such modes are observed, for example, as opening cracks at the crest in early stages of slope failure and as blocks separating from one another, giving rise to toppling failures. The shear strength of rocks is typically represented by a non-linear strength envelope, whereas soils are more commonly described with a linear function of normal stress. The role of the strength envelope and the plastic flow rule will be discussed in the context of rupture modes in slope failures. Examples of slope analyses with geomaterial rupture will be shown with a focus on the safety assessment of slopes. It will be demonstrated that neglecting rupture modes in stability analyses may contribute to overestimating the slope safety.
机译:边坡稳定性分析的方法(例如极限分析或极限平衡法)要求假定破坏模式和材料屈服模式。他们通常通过沿运动学不连续性(模式)假设剪切型材料破坏(模式)来实现。然而,对边坡破坏的观察得出的结论是,除了剪切型破坏,土壤和岩石都经常表现出破裂型的破坏模式,并具有较大的位移分离分量。观察到这种模式,例如,在斜坡破坏的早期阶段,在顶部的裂缝处开裂,以及彼此分离的砌块,导致倾覆破坏。岩石的剪切强度通常用非线性强度包络线表示,而土壤通常用法向应力的线性函数表示。强度包络和塑性流动规律的作用将在边坡破坏的破裂模式中进行讨论。将以土工材料破裂的边坡分析为例,重点介绍边坡的安全性评估。将证明,在稳定性分析中忽略破裂模式可能会导致高估边坡安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号