首页> 外文会议>ASME International Offshore Wind Technical Conference >COMPARISON OF SEABED FRICTION FORMULATIONS IN A LUMPED-MASS MOORING MODEL
【24h】

COMPARISON OF SEABED FRICTION FORMULATIONS IN A LUMPED-MASS MOORING MODEL

机译:海底摩擦制剂在集体系泊模型中的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper explores the impact of friction models on mooring line simulations. Seabed friction can play an important role in the determination of mooring loads of slack-moored floating offshore wind turbines. Most mooring models include a relatively simple seabed friction formulation, if any, and little examination of their accuracy is available in literature. Current implementations typically represent seabed contact as coulombic friction with ramping near zero velocity to mitigate instability in the numerical time integration. To assess the impact of this friction model's use, we compare it against a more sophisticated friction model. This model differentiates between static and kinetic friction, where the former is dependent upon the forces acting on the line and the latter is a function of seabed's normal response. Both friction models have been implemented into the MoorDyn mooring dynamics simulator and tested under a set of prescribed scenarios including snap loads and oscillatory motion, where the fairlead of a mooring line was driven along both linear and circular paths. Additionally, coupled floating wind turbine simulations using the OC4-DeepCwind semisubmersible show how the friction models affect the platform global response and the extreme and fatigue mooring loads. The results highlight practical differences between the models in terms of both loads prediction and simulation stability/consistency.
机译:本文探讨了摩擦模型对系泊线模拟的影响。海底摩擦可以在确定停泊浮动浮动海上风力涡轮机的系泊载荷中发挥重要作用。大多数系泊型号包括一个相对简单的海底摩擦配方,如果有的话,并且在文献中可以获得它们的准确性。电流实现通常代表海床接触作为库仑摩擦,距离零速度接近零速度,以减轻数值集成中的不稳定性。为了评估这种摩擦模型的使用的影响,我们将其与更复杂的摩擦模型进行比较。该模型区分了静态和动力学摩擦之间的区别,前者取决于作用在线的力,后者是海底正常反应的函数。两种摩擦模型都已实施到Moordyn系泊动力学模拟器中,并在一组规定的场景下测试,包括卡扣载荷和振荡运动,其中系泊线的Fairlead沿着线性和圆形路径驱动。此外,使用OC4-Deepcwind半机械耦合浮动风力涡轮机模拟摩擦模型如何影响平台全球响应和极端和疲劳系泊载荷。结果在负载预测和仿真稳定性/一致性方面突出了模型之间的实际差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号