首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management >Best Bang for the Buck? Capacity Building for Strategic Trade Management of CBRN Materials in the Middle East and North Africa
【24h】

Best Bang for the Buck? Capacity Building for Strategic Trade Management of CBRN Materials in the Middle East and North Africa

机译:雄鹿最好的爆炸?中东和北非CBRN材料战略贸易管理能力建设

获取原文

摘要

In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, several states are gunning for commercial or military-grade nuclear technology today. Among these states are Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the UAE, and Yemen. While some states envision enhancing their energy capacities and expand the energy mix by introducing nuclear into the fold, other states are apparently locked in a race to be on an even keel with or even one-up their neighbors regarding nuclear weapons capability. In recent history, the MENA region has been plagued by terrorist activity, with groups such as the Islamic State (IS) exhibiting a strong presence. A few select countries in the region such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Jordan, Algeria, and Iran have published detailed reports on their compliance with the UN Security Council Resolution 1540 that, among other things, specifies measures for ensuring strategic trade management (STM). The Gulf Cooperation Council and the League of Arab States are also harping on the much-needed efforts under UNSCR 1540 in the region. However, certain states have remained 'disbelievers' - they are neither in a position to implement the STM regulations nor do they buy into this theory at all. The heinous question staring us in the face thus is what if CBRN and other potentially martial technology is diverted from their regular course - be it medical isotopes from hospitals, industrial sources from construction sites, dual-use nuclear commodities, high-speed computers, sophisticated machine tools, and titanium - and clandestinely or through deception end up in terrorist hands? The next fundamental question being, are the present STM regulations and capabilities in these countries sufficiently mature to tackle such challenges and foresee new ones? Finally, are the time, energy and resources being spent by states such as the United States of America or Japan, for instance, and national agglomerations such as the European Union being utilized in the most efficient and effective ways possible? This paper seeks to identify existing lacunae in the present STM architecture in the Middle East and suggest practical denouements to cement the glaring caveats.
机译:在中东和北非(MENA)地区,今天有几个州都在争取商业或军事级核技术。这些国家包括阿尔及利亚,埃及,以色列,约旦,科威特,利比亚,摩洛哥,卡塔尔,沙特阿拉伯,苏丹,叙利亚,突尼斯,阿联酋和也门。尽管一些州设想通过引入核武器来提高其能源容量并扩大能源结构,但其他州显然在与核武器能力甚至与邻国成龙相伴的竞赛中陷入困境。在最近的历史中,中东和北非地区一直受到恐怖活动的困扰,诸如伊斯兰国(IS)等组织表现出强大的影响力。阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE),约旦,阿尔及利亚和伊朗等该地区的一些特定国家/地区已经发布了有关其遵守联合国安理会第1540号决议的详细报告,该决议除其他外,明确规定了确保战略贸易管理的措施(STM)。海湾合作委员会和阿拉伯国家联盟也正在根据联合国安理会第1540号决议在该地区进行急需的努力。但是,某些州仍然是“不信者”-他们既无权执行STM法规,也完全不接受这一理论。因此,面对我们的一个令人发指的问题是,如果CBRN和其他可能的军事技术偏离其常规路线,那该怎么办-是医院的医疗同位素,建筑工地的工业来源,两用核商品,高速计算机,复杂的技术机床和钛-秘密或通过欺骗最终落入恐怖分子之手?下一个基本问题是,这些国家/地区目前的STM法规和能力是否已经足够成熟,可以应对此类挑战并预见到新的挑战?最后,例如,诸如美利坚合众国或日本这样的国家正在花费时间,精力和资源,而诸如欧洲联盟这样的国家集团正在以最有效和最有效的方式加以利用吗?本文力图找出中东地区目前STM体系结构中存在的缺陷,并提出切实可行的措辞来巩固明显的警告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号