首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting;AIAA SciTech forum >An Investigation of Continuous and Discontinuous Finite-Element Discretizations on Benchmark 3D Turbulent Flows (Invited)
【24h】

An Investigation of Continuous and Discontinuous Finite-Element Discretizations on Benchmark 3D Turbulent Flows (Invited)

机译:基准3D湍流连续和不连续有限元离散化的研究(邀请)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two high-order finite-element solvers are used to simulate two 3D benchmark problems provided by the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR) website. The first problem is a subsonic turbulent flow over a hemisphere-cylinder body at angles of attack of 5 and 19 degrees. The second problem is a transonic turbulent flow an ONERA M6 wing at angles of attack of 3.06 and 6.06 degrees. The first finite-element solver is based on the streamline-upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) discretization and the second one is based on the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method. For both problems, second- and higher-order solutions are provided and a detailed mesh convergence study is presented. Also, the linear and nonlinear convergence behavior of the utilized solvers is investigated. The SUPG solver shows a very consistent non-linear convergence behavior across all grids while the DG solver struggles on the coarse grids. Both finite-element solvers demonstrate rapid convergence for high-order simulations when initialized with a second-order accurate solution. For all hemisphere-cylinder cases and the M6 wing at angle of attack of 3.06 degrees, the finite-element solvers are outperforming the FUN3D finite-volume solver in terms of accuracy per degree of freedom. For the MG wing at angle of attack of 6.06 degrees, although no reference solutions were provided by the TMR website, simulations were attempted for the finite-element solvers. For this case, no conclusions can be made about asymptotic convergence of the integrated forces due to lack of consistency between results. This was initially thought to be caused by the provided grids. However, further investigation using custom unstructured grids leads us to believe that the flow conditions, not the grids, make this case challenging.
机译:两个高阶有限元求解器用于模拟NASA湍流建模资源(TMR)网站提供的两个3D基准问题。第一个问题是在半球圆柱体上的亚音速湍流,其迎角为5度和19度。第二个问题是ONERA M6机翼的跨音速湍流,迎角为3.06和6.06度。第一个有限元求解器基于流线上风Petrov-Galerkin(SUPG)离散化,第二个基于不连续Galerkin(DG)方法。对于这两个问题,都提供了二阶和高阶解,并给出了详细的网格收敛研究。此外,还研究了所使用求解器的线性和非线性收敛行为。 SUDG求解器在所有网格上显示出非常一致的非线性收敛行为,而DG求解器则在粗网格上进行挣扎。当使用二阶精确解进行初始化时,两个有限元求解器都证明了对高阶模拟的快速收敛。对于所有半球圆柱体情况和M6机翼的迎角为3.06度,在每个自由度的精度方面,有限元求解器的性能均优于FUN3D有限体积求解器。对于攻角为6.06度的MG机翼,尽管TMR网站未提供参考解决方案,但仍尝试对有限元求解器进行仿真。对于这种情况,由于结果之间缺乏一致性,因此无法得出关于合力渐近收敛的结论。最初认为这是由提供的网格引起的。但是,使用自定义非结构化网格的进一步调查使我们相信,流动条件而非网格使这种情况具有挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号