首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference >MatGap: A Systematic Approach to Perform Match and Gap Analysis among SBVR-Based Domain Specific Business Rules
【24h】

MatGap: A Systematic Approach to Perform Match and Gap Analysis among SBVR-Based Domain Specific Business Rules

机译:MatGap:在基于SBVR的域特定业务规则之间执行匹配和差距分析的系统方法

获取原文

摘要

In the modern age, the need for automation has led to Business Organizations representing their functionality as structured Business Rules. SBVR has come up as an universally popular format for representation of Business Rules. The presence of different Business Organizations working in a particular real life domain results in generation of different rules for each of the organization. Due to the varying business practices, like mergers & acquisitions, upgrades, incorporation of a new application, etc., it becomes necessary to compare a set of Business Rules of a particular organization with the rules of a reference model, to get a measure of similarity among the business functionality of the two. Presently, this comparison is carried out manually by business experts or by executing the rules of one organization with the data of another and checking if they are compliant. Both the approaches are extremely tedious and expensive as modern organizations have huge rule sets and data sets.We present MatGap, a tool which performs a systematic Match and Gap Analysis between two sets of SBVR-based Business Rules applicable to a specific domain, using Global Vectors(GloVe) model and SMT-LIBv2. The analysis report gives a measure of Match among the rules and entities, thus providing the best alignment and aids to identify the representational Gaps(if any) among the rules and entities. The tool also checks whether the embedded logic in the reference Business Rule set is covered by the other Rule set, thus highlighting the business functionality gap that is present in the latter.
机译:在现代时代,对自动化的需求导致业务组织将其功能表示为结构化的业务规则。 SBVR已经成为一种普遍流行的表示业务规则的格式。在特定的现实生活域中工作的不同业务组织的存在导致为每个组织生成不同的规则。由于业务实践的变化,例如合并与收购,升级,合并新应用程序等,因此有必要将特定组织的一组业务规则与参考模型的规则进行比较,以衡量两者的业务功能之间的相似性。当前,这种比较是由业务专家手动执行的,或者通过将一个组织的规则与另一个组织的数据一起执行,并检查它们是否合规来进行。由于现代组织拥有庞大的规则集和数据集,因此这两种方法都非常繁琐且昂贵。 Vectors(GloVe)模型和SMT-LIBv2。分析报告提供了规则和实体之间的匹配度的度量,从而提供了最佳的对齐方式,并有助于识别规则和实体之间的代表性差距(如果有)。该工具还检查参考业务规则集中的嵌入式逻辑是否被另一个规则集覆盖,从而突出显示后者中存在的业务功能差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号