首页> 外文会议>International Conference on speech and computer >Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods for Automatic Deception Detection in Speech
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Classification Methods for Automatic Deception Detection in Speech

机译:语音自动欺骗检测分类方法的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents the experimental results carried on the speech processing methods for paralinguistic analysis of deceptive and truthful statements. It includes a short survey of databases that contain both deceptive and truthful speech samples, as well as recently developed deception detection systems that were proposed within the framework of computational paralinguistic challenge ComParE-2016 and other scopes. Based on the analysis and comparison of different approaches for processing deceptive and truthful utterances the best methods and optimal parameters are reported as following. The highest performance in terms of Unweighted Average Recall (UAR) measure has been obtained by a Random Forest based classifier with UAR = 79.3%. High results have been shown by a single k-Nearest Neighbor classifier, as well as its combination with other classification methods such as Bagging and Classification via Regression, which demonstrated UAR = 76.3%.
机译:本文介绍了语音处理方法进行的实验结果,这些方法用于对欺骗性陈述和真实陈述进行副语言分析。它包括对包含欺骗性和真实性语音样本的数据库的简短调查,以及在计算语言学挑战性ComParE-2016和其他范围内提出的最近开发的欺骗检测系统。在分析和比较处理欺骗性和真实性话语的不同方法的基础上,报告了以下最佳方法和最佳参数。通过基于随机森林的分类器(UAR = 79.3%)获得了按非加权平均召回率(UAR)衡量的最高性能。单个k最近邻分类器及其与其他分类方法(例如装袋和通过回归进行分类)的组合显示了很高的结果,证明UAR = 76.3%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号