首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory >Comparison of the Ionospheric F2 Region Critical Frequency between Ionosonde Measurements and IRI-2016 Predictions over Sanya
【24h】

Comparison of the Ionospheric F2 Region Critical Frequency between Ionosonde Measurements and IRI-2016 Predictions over Sanya

机译:离子体F 2 区域临界频率对三亚的IONOSONDE测量与IRI-2016预测的临界频率

获取原文

摘要

The ionospheric F2 region critical frequency (foF2) data collected by Sanya ionosonde (18.3°N, 109.6°E; geomagnetic: 8.39°N, 181.97°E) in 2014 have been analyzed and compared with IRI-2016 predictions using CCIR and URSI options under low geomagnetic activity conditions. We found that the peak duration of the observed foF2 values was longer in spring and autumn than that in summer and winter. Usually, the maximum of the observed foF2 appeared near 8 UT (i.e., 15 LT), and the observed foF2 had two peaks in spring and autumn. The observed foF2 values in summer were generally smaller than those in winter. Moreover, the observed foF2 values in winter were smaller than those in the equinox months. That is to say, the presence of semiannual and winter anomaly in the observed foF2 was found over Sanya in 2014. The prediction accuracy of the IRI-2016 predictions with the CCIR option and that with the URSI option are basically the same. The foF2 values predicted by IRI-2016 model are close to the observed values during daytime. However, the deviation (i.e., the absolute deviation and the relative deviation) of the IRI-2016 predicted foF2 values with respect to the observed foF2 values during nighttime is much larger than that during daytime. During nighttime, the IRI-2016 predicted foF2 values with the CCIR or URSI option underestimate or overestimate the observed foF2 values more than 50%. In general, the IRI-2016 predicted foF2 values with the CCIR or URSI option underestimate the observed foF2 values in the equinox months and overestimate the observed foF2 values in January, June and July. Therefore, our findings show that IRI-2016 model cannot predict foF2 over Sanya in 2014 very well.
机译:电离层F. 2 Sanya Ionosonde收集的区域临界频率(FOF2)数据(18.3°N,109.6°E; Geomagnetic:8.39°N,181.97°E)已经分析,并与使用CCIR和URSI选项在低地磁下的IRI-2016预测进行了比较活动条件。我们发现观察到的FOF2值的峰值持续时间在春季和秋季比夏季和冬季更长。通常,观察到的FOF2的最大值出现在8 UT附近(即,15 LT),并且观察到的FOF2在春季和秋季有两个峰。夏季观察到的FOF2值通常比冬季的FOF2值小。此外,冬季的观察到的FOF2值小于四分之一月份的FOF2值。也就是说,在2014年在三亚发现了观察到的FOF2中半年和冬季异常的存在。与CCIR选项的IRI-2016预测的预测准确性以及与URSI选项的预测准确性基本相同。 IRI-2016模型预测的FOF2值在白天期间接近观察到的值。然而,IRI-2016预测的FOF2值相对于观察到的FOF2值期间的偏差(即绝对偏差和相对偏差)远远大于白天期间的FOF2值。在夜间期间,IRI-2016预测FOF2值与CCIR或URSI期权低估或高估观察到的FOF2值超过50 %。一般而言,IRI-2016预测的FOF2值与CCIR或URSI期权低估了一肢月中观察到的FOF2值,并在1月,6月和7月高估了观察到的FOF2值。因此,我们的研究结果表明,2016年IRI-2016模型在2014年无法预测Sanya的FOF2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号