首页> 外文会议>IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks >Characterising LEDBAT Performance Through Bottlenecks Using PIE, FQ-CoDel and FQ-PIE Active Queue Management
【24h】

Characterising LEDBAT Performance Through Bottlenecks Using PIE, FQ-CoDel and FQ-PIE Active Queue Management

机译:通过使用PIE,FQ-CoDel和FQ-PIE主动队列管理的瓶颈来表征LEDBAT性能

获取原文

摘要

Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) is defined in RFC6817 as a congestion control algorithm for lower than best effort transport service that reacts to both delay and loss congestion signals. LEDBAT allows bulk transfer applications (such peer-to-peer file transfer and software updates) to utilize available capacity in the background while limiting additional forward queuing delays at network bottlenecks to 100ms. New Active Queue Management(AQM) schemes similarly aim for low latencies by dropping or marking packets when the bottleneck queuing delay exceeds thresholds much lower than 100ms. Due to renewed interest in deploying modern AQMs on home broadband services, we experimentally evaluate and characterize the impact of placing PIE, FQ-CoDel and FQ-PIE variants of AQM in the path of flows generated by libutp (a widely deployed UDP-based LEDBAT implementation). We uncover, and propose solutions to, some differences between libutp and RFC6817 that lead to poor utilization and incorrect inter-flow capacity sharing over AQM bottlenecks.
机译:低额外延迟本底传输(LEDBAT)在RFC6817中定义为一种拥塞控制算法,用于比尽力而为传输服务低的服务,该服务对延迟和丢失拥塞信号均做出反应。 LEDBAT允许批量传输应用程序(例如对等文件传输和软件更新)在后台利用可用容量,同时将网络瓶颈处的额外前向排队延迟限制为100ms。新的主动队列管理(AQM)计划类似地通过在瓶颈排队延迟超过远低于100ms的阈值时丢弃或标记数据包来实现低延迟。由于对在家庭宽带服务上部署现代AQM的重新兴趣,我们通过实验评估并确定了将AQM的PIE,FQ-CoDel和FQ-PIE变体放置在libutp生成的流的路径中的影响(广泛部署的基于UDP的LEDBAT执行)。我们发现libutp和RFC6817之间的一些差异,并针对这些差异提出解决方案,这些差异会导致利用率低下以及AQM瓶颈上的不正确的流间容量共享。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号