首页> 外文会议>International workshop on multi-agent-based simulation >To Big Wing, or Not to Big Wing, Now an Answer
【24h】

To Big Wing, or Not to Big Wing, Now an Answer

机译:到大翼,还是不去大翼,现在一个答案

获取原文

摘要

The Churchillian quote "Never, in the field of human conflict, was so much owed by so many to so few" [3], encapsulates perfectly the heroics of Royal Air Force (RAF) Fighter Command (FC) during the Battle of Britain. Despite the undoubted heroics, questions remain about how FC employed the 'so few'. In particular, the question as to whether FC should have employed the 'Big Wing' tactics, as per 12 Group, or implement the smaller wings as per 11 Group, remains a source of much debate. In this paper, I create an agent based model (ABM) simulation of the Battle of Britain, which provides valuable insight into the key components that influenced the loss rates of both sides. It provides mixed support for the tactics employed by 11 Group, as the model identified numerous variables that impacted the success or otherwise of the British.
机译:丘吉尔的名言“在人类冲突领域,从来没有如此之多或如此之少” [3],完美地概括了英国战役中皇家空军(RAF)战斗机司令部(FC)的英勇表现。尽管英勇无疑,但有关FC如何雇用“那么少”的问题仍然存在。尤其是,FC是否应该按照第12组采用“大翼”战术,还是按照第11组实施较小翼的问题,仍然引起很多争论。在本文中,我创建了不列颠之战的基于代理的模型(ABM)仿真,它为影响双方损失率的关键组件提供了宝贵的见解。它为11国集团采用的策略提供了混合支持,因为该模型确定了影响英国成功与否的众多变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号