首页> 外文会议>IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science >A hybrid MTS-MTO production model with a dynamic decoupling point for flexible flow shops
【24h】

A hybrid MTS-MTO production model with a dynamic decoupling point for flexible flow shops

机译:带有动态解耦点的MTS-MTO混合生产模型,用于灵活的流水车间

获取原文

摘要

Competition and resultant complexity of today's production industry require that enterprises realize the importance of reducing total costs in production. Uncertainties of customer orders also make it difficult to determine the schedule for minimizing inventories, earliness and tardiness. In this paper, we propose a new production model for flexible flow shops, which aims to reduce the total inventories, earliness and tardiness. The model divides a flexible flow shop (FFS) into a make-to-stock (MTS) part and a make-to-order (MTO) part by applying a decoupling point. In the MTS part, jobs are manufactured into semi-finished products and then stored as inventories at the decoupling point. As soon as a customer order is received, the inventories are released into the system, starting undergoing processing in the MTO part. This shortens the lead time for manufacturing the products. Another advantage of the proposed model is that the less number of operations in the MTO part than that in a job makes it easier to avoid tardiness. In addition, we designed two types of models: dynamic and static, which depends on whether the decoupling point is dynamically adjusted to adapt to different arrival rates of customer orders. The reason why we design two types is to compare the performance of the proposed two models. Results show that the dynamic hybrid model outperforms pull, push and static hybrid models for reducing costs.
机译:当今生产行业的竞争和随之而来的复杂性要求企业意识到降低生产总成本的重要性。客户订单的不确定性也使确定最小化库存,提前和拖延的时间表变得困难。在本文中,我们提出了一种用于柔性流水车间的新生产模型,该模型旨在减少总库存,早期性和拖延性。该模型通过应用去耦点将弹性流水车间(FFS)分为按库存生产(MTS)部分和按订单生产(MTO)部分。在MTS零件中,作业被制造为半成品,然后在退耦点作为库存存储。收到客户订单后,库存便被释放到系统中,开始在MTO部件中进行处理。这缩短了制造产品的交货时间。提出的模型的另一个优点是,MTO部件中的操作数量少于作业中的操作数量,因此可以更轻松地避免拖延。此外,我们设计了两种模型:动态模型和静态模型,这取决于是否动态调整去耦点以适应不同的客户订单到达率。我们设计两种类型的原因是为了比较建议的两种模型的性能。结果表明,动态混合模型在降低成本方面优于拉,推和静态混合模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号