首页> 外文会议>International conference and exhibition on fire and materials >FIRE TOXICITY OF AIRCRAFT SEAT COVERS AND SEAT FOAM
【24h】

FIRE TOXICITY OF AIRCRAFT SEAT COVERS AND SEAT FOAM

机译:飞机座椅盖和座椅泡沫的火灾毒性

获取原文

摘要

A cone calorimeter with air supply box around the fire test zone was shown to reproduce all the classic features of compartment fires and hence could provide a basis for the determination of toxic gases emitted from materials in fires, under realistic test conditions. Direct hot exhaust gas sampling was used from a small chimney attached to the cone heater outlet and heated sample lines, pumps and filters were used to transport the sample to a heated Temet FT1R, calibrated for all the toxic gases of interest in fire toxicity. Three aircraft seat material were tested, two seat covers of fabric and leather and the seat foam. All the materials were from commercial suppliers to the aircraft industry. Ventilation conditions in the fires were typical of those on aircraft at 9-15 ACH. All three material samples had S and N in their composition, the S from the fire retardants and N from the use of an acrylic fibre in the seat covers and of PUF in the seat foam. As a consequence SO_2 and HCN were major toxic species in all the material fires. In all the fires HF was detected and for the foam and the leather seat cover HC1 was detected and these indicate the presence of halogen based fire retardants in the material composition. Thus, most of the toxic gases measured were due to the presence of S, N, F and CI in the material composition. Other toxic gases detected were the more conventional fire toxic gases CO, formaldehyde, acrolein and benzene. Only in the fabric fire was N0_2 significant. The peak toxicity occurred in the initial flaming combustion and the toxicity order was leather > fabric > foam on both an LC(_50) and COSHH(_15min) toxic assessment basis. Both toxic assessment methods showed the same group of toxic gases were important and only their relative importance changed between the toxic assessment methods. It was concluded that toxic gas assessment should be added to current material test programmes on fire behavior and that the cone calorimeter, modified as in the present work, was a good basis for the toxic gas measurements.
机译:圆锥形量热计在燃烧试验区周围带有供气盒,显示出了舱室火灾的所有经典特征,因此可以为在真实的试验条件下确定火灾中物质排放的有毒气体提供基础。使用连接到锥形加热器出口的小烟囱进行直接热废气采样,并使用加热的样品管线,泵和过滤器将样品运输到加热的Temet FT1R,并针对所有与火毒有关的有毒气体进行校准。测试了三种飞机座椅材料,两个织物和皮革座椅套以及座椅泡沫。所有材料都是从商业供应商到飞机行业。着火时的通风条件是飞机在9-15 ACH时的典型通风条件。这三种材料样品的成分均具有S和N,阻燃剂中的S和座椅套中使用丙烯酸纤维以及座椅泡沫中的PUF组成的N。结果,SO_2和HCN是所有火灾中的主要有毒物质。在所有火灾中均检测到HF,并检测到泡沫和皮革座垫HC1,这些表明材料成分中存在卤素基阻燃剂。因此,测得的大多数有毒气体是由于材料成分中存在S,N,F和CI所致。检测到的其他有毒气体是更常规的火灾有毒气体CO,甲醛,丙烯醛和苯。 N0_2仅在织物着火中显着。在LC(_50)和COSHH(_15min)毒性评估的基础上,最大的毒性发生在最初的燃烧燃烧中,并且毒性顺序为皮革>织物>泡沫。两种毒性评估方法都表明同一组有毒气体很重要,并且在两种毒性评估方法之间只有它们的相对重要性发生了变化。结论是,应将有毒气体评估添加到有关火灾行为的当前材料测试程序中,并且按本工作进行修改的锥形量热仪是有毒气体测量的良好基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号