首页> 外文会议>International conference on algorithmic decision theory >Logic-Based Merging in Fragments of Classical Logic with Inputs from Social Choice Theory
【24h】

Logic-Based Merging in Fragments of Classical Logic with Inputs from Social Choice Theory

机译:社会选择理论的投入,基于逻辑的古典逻辑片段的合并

获取原文

摘要

Aggregation. One does not need to look far to find problems which require harmonization of different, possibly conflicting, preferences. Problems of this sort occur, on a grand scale, in national elections. But they also occur on smaller scales, in day-to-day decision processes such as friends settling on a place for lunch, or co-workers choosing available timeslots for a meeting. And, of course, they are encountered in the technical domain: an automated recommender system designed to suggest items to a group of agents, will first have to get an idea of the group's preferences. To do that it should take into account the individual preferences, typically by looking at how they rate various products, and distil them into a portrait of the group's desires [15,16]. Elections, hungry friends and target groups are all situations in which a collection of agents needs to be thought of and modelled as a single agent. And one wonders, naturally, about the best, most efficient way to do this.
机译:聚合。人们无需费劲就可以找到需要协调不同的,可能相互冲突的偏好的问题。这类问题在全国大选中大范围出现。但是它们也发生在较小的规模上,例如在朋友在一个午餐地点定居或同事选择可用的会议时间之类的日常决策过程中。而且,当然,它们是在技术领域中遇到的:设计为向一组座席推荐项目的自动化推荐系统将首先必须了解该组的偏好。为此,应考虑个人的喜好,通常是通过观察他们对各种产品的评价,然后将其分解为群体的期望肖像[15,16]。选举,饥饿的朋友和目标群体都是需要考虑一组特工并将其建模为单个特工的所有情况。自然,人们想知道这样做的最佳,最有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号