This paper presents numerical liquefaction simulations of a hypothetical sand in cyclic direct simple shear tests for four different constitutive models. The four models are PM4Sand in FLAC, UBCSand in FLAC, Pressure Dependent Multi Yield 02 (PDMY02) in OpenSees, and the Manzari-Dafalias04 model in OpenSees. Parameters published by others for various sands were used for this work to avoid possible introduction of our bias into the calibration process. The material properties were determined by others for different uniformly graded sands, all with a relative density of approximately 50%. The simulations do not pertain to one sand or one set of laboratory data, so therefore, there is no right or wrong answer. Instead, the goal of this paper is compare a consistent set of results that show the implementations of each model behave as expected, and to illustrate basic differences in behavior of the different models. Cyclic strength curves (cyclic stress as a function of number of cycles) illustrate the behavior of the models over a range of cyclic stresses. Each model displays pore pressure build up, softening, and cyclic contraction-dilation cycles associated with cyclic mobility. Two of the models soften to a point, but then stabilize in a repeated hysteresis loop with no additional growth in the cyclic strain amplitude after some number of cycles.
展开▼
