首页> 外文会议>European Rotorcraft Forum >ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR MODELING INFLOW DYNAMICS OF A COAXIAL ROTOR SYSTEM
【24h】

ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR MODELING INFLOW DYNAMICS OF A COAXIAL ROTOR SYSTEM

机译:轴流转子系统动力学建模的解析方法。

获取原文

摘要

For real-time rotor inflow calculations, finite state inflow models are often used due to the fact that they are more computationally efficient compared to CFD models. Single rotor pressure and velocity potential inflow models have been shown to correctly predict induced velocities across a rotor disk. Both models are formulated from an incompressible potential flow solution and assume a rigid cylindrical wake structure. An extension of single rotor inflow models to a coaxial rotor system by superposition method is explored in this paper. In the velocity potential superposition method, rotor-to-rotor interactions are considered through individual rotor loads. For the pressure potential superposition approach, the coupling between upper and lower rotors are done through the apparent mass matrix (M-matrix) and the inflow influence coefficient matrix (L-matrix). The resulting two inflow models for a coaxial rotor system are compared using their response predictions both in time and frequency domains. Differences in transient responses between the two models are found when subjected to step perturbations on individual rotor loadings of a coaxial rotor system. In addition, significant phase differences between the models are observed in their frequency responses. The differences in transient responses between the two models can be attributed to the fact that it takes finite time for upper rotor inflow perturbations to propagate to the lower rotor, which is captured in the velocity potential superposition method as opposed to the pressure potential superposition method.
机译:对于实时转子流入计算,经常使用有限状态流入模型,因为与CFD模型相比,它们具有更高的计算效率。已经显示了单个转子压力和速度势流入模型可以正确预测整个转子盘上的感应速度。两种模型均由不可压缩的势流解决方案公式化,并采用刚性圆柱状尾流结构。本文探索了通过叠加法将单转子流入模型扩展到同轴转子系统的方法。在速度势叠加法中,通过单独的转子载荷来考虑转子间的相互作用。对于压力势能叠加方法,上下转子之间的耦合通过视在质量矩阵(M-矩阵)和流入影响系数矩阵(L-矩阵)完成。使用它们在时域和频域中的响应预测,对所得的两个同轴转子系统流入模型进行比较。当对同轴转子系统的各个转子负载进行阶跃扰动时,会发现两个模型之间的瞬态响应有所不同。另外,在模型之间的频率响应中观察到明显的相位差。两种模型之间瞬态响应的差异可以归因于这样的事实,即上转子流入的扰动传播到下转子需要一定的时间,这在速度势叠加方法中得到了体现,而在压力势叠加方法中却被捕获。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号