首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting;AIAA SciTech Forum >A Preliminary Comparison of Three Dimensional Particle Tracking and Sizing using Plenoptic Imaging and Digital In-line Holography
【24h】

A Preliminary Comparison of Three Dimensional Particle Tracking and Sizing using Plenoptic Imaging and Digital In-line Holography

机译:利用全光成像和数字在线全息技术对三维粒子跟踪和尺寸调整的初步比较

获取原文

摘要

Digital in-line holography and plenoptic photography are two techniques for single-shot, volumetric measurement of 3D particle fields. Here we present a preliminary comparison of the two methods by applying plenoptic imaging to experimental configurations that have been previously investigated with digital in-line holography. These experiments include the tracking of secondary droplets from the impact of a water drop on a thin film of water and tracking of pellets from a shotgun. Both plenoptic imaging and digital in-line holography successfully quantify the 3D nature of these particle fields. This includes measurement of the 3D particle position, individual particle sizes, and three-component velocity vectors. For the initial processing methods presented here, both techniques give out-of-plane positional accuracy of approximately 1-2 particle diameters. For a fixed image sensor, digital holography achieves higher effective in-plane spatial resolutions. However, collimated and coherent illumination makes holography susceptible to image distortion through index of refraction gradients, as demonstrated in the shotgun experiments. On the other hand, plenoptic imaging allows for a simpler experimental configuration. Furthermore, due to the use of diffuse, white-light illumination, plenoptic imaging is less susceptible to image distortion in the shotgun experiments. Additional work is needed to better quantify sources of uncertainty, particularly in the plenoptic experiments, as well as develop data processing methodologies optimized for the plenoptic measurement.
机译:数字在线全息照相和全光摄影是用于3D粒子场的单次体积测量的两种技术。在这里,我们通过将全光成像应用于先前已通过数字在线全息术进行研究的实验配置,对这两种方法进行了初步比较。这些实验包括从水滴对水薄膜的冲击中跟踪次级液滴,并跟踪来自a弹枪的药丸。全光成像和数字全息照相都成功地量化了这些粒子场的3D性质。这包括3D粒子位置,单个粒子尺寸和三分量速度矢量的测量。对于此处介绍的初始处理方法,这两种技术均提供了大约1-2个粒径的面外位置精度。对于固定图像传感器,数字全息技术可实现更高的有效平面内空间分辨率。但是,准直和相干的照明使全息照相易于通过折射率梯度产生图像失真,如gun弹枪实验所示。另一方面,全光成像允许更简单的实验配置。此外,由于使用了漫射白光照明,在len弹枪实验中,全光成像不太容易受到图像失真的影响。需要进行额外的工作来更好地量化不确定性的来源,尤其是在全光实验中,以及开发针对全光测量优化的数据处理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号