首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting;AIAA SciTech Forum >Comparison of Drag Prediction Using RANS models and DDES for the DLR-F6 Configuration Using High Order Schemes
【24h】

Comparison of Drag Prediction Using RANS models and DDES for the DLR-F6 Configuration Using High Order Schemes

机译:使用RANS模型和DDES对高阶方案进行DLR-F6配置的阻力预测的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares the accuracy and robustness of steady state RANS, unsteady RANS, and DDES turbulence models with high order schemes for predicting the drag of the DLR-F6 configuration. The implicit time marching method with unfactored Gauss-Seidel line relaxation is used with a 5th order WENO finite difference scheme for Navier-Stokes equations. The viscous terms are discretized using a 4th order conservative central differencing. The effect of grid size on the accuracy of drag prediction by using the different turbulent models are conducted on the coarse, medium and fine mesh models at the same angle of attack. The coarse mesh has about 10 drag counts deviation from the experiment, the medium mesh has 28 counts, and the fine mesh has about 15 counts difference. The RANS method achieves almost the same results as URANS and DDES at angle of attack of 0.49°. The DDES have the least deviation from the experimental drag result and the closest pressure distribution to the experiment in the trailing edge separation zone. However, since the DDES uses the same mesh as the RANS model in this paper, the DDES results should not be considered as conclusive.
机译:本文使用高阶方案比较了稳态RANS,非稳态RANS和DDES湍流模型的准确性和鲁棒性,以预测DLR-F6配置的阻力。对于Navier-Stokes方程,采用具有无因子高斯-赛德尔线松弛的隐式时间行进方法和5阶WENO有限差分方案。粘性项使用4阶保守中心差分法离散化。在不同的湍流模型下,以相同的迎角对不同的湍流模型进行网格大小对阻力预测精度的影响。粗网格与实验的偏差数约为10,中网格的计数为28,而细网格的偏差为15。 RANS方法在0.49°的迎角下可获得与URANS和DDES几乎相同的结果。在后缘分离区中,DDES与实验阻力结果的偏差最小,并且压力分布最接近实验。但是,由于DDES使用与RANS模型相同的网格,因此DDES结果不应被认为是结论性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号