首页> 外文会议>Conference on nanoscale imaging, sensing, and actuation for biomedical applications >Image and flow cytometric analysis of gold nanoparticle uptake by macrophages
【24h】

Image and flow cytometric analysis of gold nanoparticle uptake by macrophages

机译:巨噬细胞摄取金纳米颗粒的图像和流式细胞仪分析

获取原文

摘要

Background/Aim: In atherosclerosis stable and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque types are distinguished that behave differently concerning rupture, thrombosis and clinical events. The stable are rich in M2 macrophages. The unstable are rich in inflammatory M1 macrophages and are highly susceptible to rupture, setting patients at risk for thrombotic events when they undergo invasive diagnosis such as coronary angiography. Therefore, novel approaches for non-invasive detection and classification of vulnerable plaques in vivo are needed. Whereas classical approaches fail to differentiate between both plaque types, a new biophotonic method (combination of the diffusion reflection (DR) method with flow cytometry (FCM) or image cytometry (IC)) to analyze gold nanoparticle (GNP) loading of plaques could overcome this limitation. Methods: Two types of GNP were used three variants of gold nanorods (GNRⅠ with 40×18 nm, Ⅱ 65×25 nm and Ⅲ 52×13 nm in size) and gold nanospheres (GNS with an average diameter of 18.5 nm). The GNS had an absorption peak at 520 nm and the GNR at 630 nm. Monocytes were isolated from human buffy blood samples, differentiated into macrophages and their subtypes and labelled with GNR and GNS for 3 and 24 h. GNS and GNR loading were determined by FCM and/or IC. Macrophages within tissue-like phantoms were analyzed by the DR system. Results: After GNR labelling of macrophages the FCM light scatter values increased up to 3.7 fold and the DR slope changed from an average slope of 0.196 (macrophages only) to an average slope of 0.827 (macrophages labelled with GNR). But, GNRⅢ did not present much higher DR slopes than the control phantoms, indicating that macrophages take up GNRⅢ in a lower amount than GNRⅠ or Ⅱ. IC and microscopy showed that all particle variants were taken up by the cells in a heterogeneous fashion. Conclusion and outlook: The combination of FCM and DR measurements provides a potential novel, highly sensitive and non-invasive method for the identification of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques, aimed to develop a potential tool for in vivo tracking. Further experiments will show, if different macrophage subtypes (M1 or M2) take up the particles differently and may thereby serve to distinguish stable from vulnerable plaques.
机译:背景/目的:在动脉粥样硬化中,区分出稳定和脆弱的动脉粥样硬化斑块类型,它们在破裂,血栓形成和临床事件方面表现不同。马stable富含M2巨噬细胞。不稳定动物富含炎症性M1巨噬细胞,极易破裂,使患者在进行侵入性诊断(如冠状动脉造影)时有发生血栓形成事件的风险。因此,需要用于体内的易损斑块的非侵入性检测和分类的新颖方法。尽管经典方法无法区分两种噬菌斑类型,但可以克服一种新的生物光子方法(将扩散反射(DR)方法与流式细胞术(FCM)或图像细胞术(IC)结合使用)来分析金纳米颗粒(GNP)噬菌斑的负载量这个限制。方法:使用两种GNP,分别使用金纳米棒(尺寸为40×18 nm,Ⅱ65×25 nm和Ⅲ52×13 nm)和金纳米球(平均直径为18.5 nm的GNS)的三种变体。 GNS在520 nm处有一个吸收峰,而GNR在630 nm处有一个吸收峰。从人类血沉棕褐色的血液样本中分离出单核细胞,分化为巨噬细胞及其亚型,并用GNR和GNS标记3和24 h。通过FCM和/或IC确定GNS和GNR的加载。通过DR系统分析组织样体模内的巨噬细胞。结果:巨噬细胞的GNR标记后,FCM的光散射值增加到3.7倍,DR斜率从0.196(仅巨噬细胞)的平均斜率变为0.827(标有GNR的巨噬细胞)的平均斜率。但是,GNRⅢ没有比对照体模高得多的DR斜率,这表明巨噬细胞对GNRⅢ的吸收量低于GNRⅠ或Ⅱ。 IC和显微镜检查显示,所有颗粒变体均以异质方式被细胞吸收。结论与展望:FCM和DR测量的结合提供了一种潜在的新颖,高度灵敏且非侵入性的方法来鉴定动脉粥样硬化易损斑块,旨在开发一种潜在的体内追踪工具。进一步的实验将表明,如果不同的巨噬细胞亚型(M1或M2)以不同的方式吸收颗粒,从而可以区分稳定斑块和易损斑块。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号