首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging >Classification-based tests for neuroimaging data analysis: comparison of best practices
【24h】

Classification-based tests for neuroimaging data analysis: comparison of best practices

机译:基于分类的神经影像数据分析测试:最佳实践比较

获取原文

摘要

In neuroimaging data analysis, classification algorithms are frequently used to discriminate between two populations of interest, like patients and healthy controls, or between stimuli presented to the subject, like face and house. Usually, the ability of the classifier to discriminate populations is used within a statistical test, in order to evaluate scientific hypotheses. In the literature, different procedures are adopted to carry out such tests, like using permutations, assuming the binomial model or using confidence intervals. Moreover multiple choices are made by practitioners when implementing those tests, like the actual classification algorithm or the use of a resampling scheme. In this work we analyze those procedures and some of those choices with respect to their effect on the Type I (false discovery) and Type II (sensitivity) errors. With a simulation study, we compare the different procedures and show the impact in practice. The final aim is to characterize the best practices and give more insight for their use.
机译:在神经影像数据分析中,经常使用分类算法来区分两个感兴趣的人群(例如患者和健康对照),或在呈现给对象的刺激(例如面部和房屋)之间。通常,在统计检验中使用分类器区分总体的能力,以便评估科学假设。在文献中,采用不同的程序来进行此类测试,例如使用排列,假设二项式模型或使用置信区间。此外,从业人员在实施这些测试时会做出多种选择,例如实际的分类算法或使用重采样方案。在这项工作中,我们就这些程序以及它们对I型(错误发现)和II型(敏感性)错误的影响进行了分析。通过仿真研究,我们比较了不同的过程,并在实践中显示了影响。最终目的是表征最佳实践,并为它们的使用提供更多见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号