首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation >AIS 3+ Thoracic Injuries Among Drivers in Real-World Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes: The Effect of Impact Direction, Impact Location and Status of Seat Belt
【24h】

AIS 3+ Thoracic Injuries Among Drivers in Real-World Motor Vehicle Frontal Crashes: The Effect of Impact Direction, Impact Location and Status of Seat Belt

机译:真实世界中汽车正面碰撞中驾驶员的AIS 3+胸部伤害:撞击方向,撞击位置和安全带状态的影响

获取原文

摘要

This paper, comparing seat belt usage, investigates the combined effects of specific impact directions and impact locations on the serious-to-maximum thoracic injuries of drivers in frontal impact based on the 1995-2010 data from the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS). The selected sample is classified by three impact locations (distributed, offset and corner) and two impact directions (pure frontal and oblique), resulting in a total of six crash configurations. The risks of thoracic injury and its anatomic structure injury for drivers, considering using seat belt or not independently, in different frontal crash configurations are evaluated. The relative risks are computed also. Overall, results of the analyses reveal that the effectiveness of thorax protection by the seat belt is significant. But for thoracic organ injuries, in frontal corner impact, using seat belt may not decrease the risk of serious-to-maximum injuries significantly, as in frontal distributed impact for skeletal injuries.
机译:本文通过比较安全带的使用情况,基于美国交通部(US DOT)1995-2010年的数据,研究了特定撞击方向和撞击位置对正面撞击中驾驶员严重至最大的胸椎伤害的综合影响。 )国家汽车采样系统-耐撞性数据系统(NASS-CDS)。所选样本按三个碰撞位置(分布,偏移和拐角)和两个碰撞方向(纯正向和倾斜)分类,总共产生六个碰撞配置。考虑到驾驶员在不同的正面碰撞情况下是否系安全带或不系安全带,胸部受伤及其解剖结构受伤的风险得到了评估。还计算了相对风险。总体而言,分析结果表明,通过安全带保护胸部的有效性是显着的。但是对于胸腔器官损伤,在额角撞击中,使用安全带可能不会显着降低严重到最大程度的伤害风险,就像在骨骼受伤的额部分布撞击中一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号